首页
登录
职称英语
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone
游客
2023-12-25
6
管理
问题
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone they’ve seen commit a crime, seven Euclid residents claim to have "witnessed" the encounter between Officer Michael Amiott and driver Richard Hubbard III by virtue of viewing a four-minute video on Facebook. Their unique argument has triggered discussion in the legal community about the role that "social media witnesses" could play in such cases.
"It used to just be the police officer’s word against the victim’s word," notes lead petitioner Richard T. Montgomery II. "Now, in the age of cellphone videos and social media, we as a community have the opportunity to participate in ensuring police accountability."
The racially and economically diverse group scored its first victory in late December when a municipal judge responded to its request by requiring the Cuyahoga County prosecutor to investigate Amiott for felonious assault during the August 2017 traffic stop.
The cellphone video, which has more than 11 million views on Facebook, shows the officer repeatedly punching Hubbard’s head as the 25-year-old man lay in the street. Separate video from a police cruiser’s dash cam shows Amiott wrestling Hubbard to the ground moments after he was ordered out of his car for a suspended driver’s license.
Amiott was fired two months later for excessive force. But in the majority-black city, emotions flared anew this October when he was rehired following an arbitrator’s ruling in his favor. The ensuing outcry included the NAACP announcing a travel advisory to people of color who might be driving through Euclid.
The legal issues raised by the citizens’ petition and the prospect of witnesses via social media are largely untested.
Cleveland attorney Rebecca Maurer, who wrote a popular blog about the "Serial" podcast’s recent focus on Cuyahoga County’s criminal justice system, expects such witnesses might have to first establish that they were somehow personally affected before being allowed to initiate charges.
"The judicial system relies on the idea of ’standing’ to regulate the type of cases that go to court," she said. "A judge who borrows from standing theory will want to know exactly why social media witnesses should initiate the case. Perhaps it’s enough if the petitioners are local residents claiming a personal stake in the security of their community."
In his ruling referring the matter to the county prosecutor, Euclid Municipal Judge Patrick Gallagher did point out that the petitioners fail to claim any "personal knowledge of Mr. Hubbard’s injuries." Had they done so, he could have taken more
drastic
action, the judge seemed to imply. Under Ohio law, Gallagher also could have used the citizens’ petition to circumvent the prosecutor’s office and issue an arrest warrant for Amiott.
Nearly a dozen other states also allow private citizens to initiate criminal charges — including Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas and Idaho.
In all but one, however, the decision to actually file criminal charges is left to a prosecutor or grand jury. The exception is South Carolina, where police also have that power.
Testimony from people claiming to have witnessed something via social media can be problematic, cautions Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina law professor and former officer, since video posted online, even unedited, often provides limited information about an event.
"Beyond what they see directly in front of them, officers also rely on peripheral, aural and tactile information ... That doesn’t always come across accurately, or at all, on video," said Stoughton, who writes extensively about police regulation and use of force. By definition, he added, social media witnesses will always have such limitations.
Some attorneys worry that the very community such individuals hope to protect could instead be negatively affected. Civil rights lawyer Maya Wiley, a former board chair of the NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board, an independent police oversight agency, warns of implicit bias in the criminal justice system that could favor a white social media witness over one of color. [br] The purpose of Paragraph 6 is to______.
选项
A、shift the focus from the facts to opinions
B、start a totally new topic
C、make a conclusion of what have been talked
D、provide evidence to the former opinions
答案
A
解析
推断题。第6段话峰一转,讨论重点从前文讨论的事件本身,转移到各方对该问题的看法,故正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3305461.html
相关试题推荐
Whatdoes"trashtalk"meanhere?A、Totalkaboutsomeoneinanamusingway.B、To
.Someonethinksthatsomepeoplekilltobecomefamous.A、正确B、错误A原文说:Hesaidh
Somepeopleareagainstthegovernment’sdependenceonnewtechnologies.A、正确B、错
Seniorswillhavenewcoverageforpreventivescreeningsagainstdiabetesandhe
一些军人和退伍军人公开反对美军对移民征兵采取的严厉审查措施。(speakoutagainst…)Somemembersofthemilitarya
它们还可以创建随机生成的密码,因此难以猜测,从而进一步抵御黑客的入侵。(defenseagainst…)Theycanalsocreaterandom
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Hewasfacingchargesonforgeryinacourtoflawbuthehiredagoodattorney
Askmostpeopletolistwhatmakesthemlikesomeoneonfirstmeetingandth
Askmostpeopletolistwhatmakesthemlikesomeoneonfirstmeetingandth
随机试题
[originaltext]ThefirstmagazinewasalittleperiodicalcalledTheReview
A.骨骼肌的牵张反射 B.婴儿吸吮奶头 C.两者皆是 D.两者皆非属于神经
回答隧道报警与诱导设施的提问。(5)隧道报警与诱导设施检验评定的外观质量标准为(
腹壁听诊,哪种声音与胎心音频率一致A.胎盘血流杂音 B.腹主动脉音 C.脐带
(2017年真题)国内企业境外IPO选择的主要市场不包括()。A.美国纽约
对投资者教育中的资产配置教育,以下表述准确的是()。 Ⅰ.资产配置教育主要关注
钢结构制作和安装单位应按规定分别进行高强度螺栓连接摩擦面的( )试验和复验,其结
共用题干 王女士去年年初进行了一笔债券投资,该债券面值1000元,票面利率6.
A.CAPB.HPMCC.乙醇D.L-HPCE.PEG崩解剂
如果可交割国债票面利率高于国债期货合约标的票面利率,转换因子和1相比是()。A
最新回复
(
0
)