首页
登录
职称英语
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
游客
2023-12-25
9
管理
问题
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only four years as a physicist at Bell Laboratories, Schon, 32, had co-authored 90 scientific papers—one every 16 days-detailing new discoveries in superconductivity, lasers, nanotechnology and quantum physics. This output astonished his colleagues, and made them
suspicious
. When one co-worker noticed that the same table of data appeared in two separate papers—which also happened to appear in the two most prestigious scientific journals in the world, Science and Nature—the jig was up. In October 2002, a Bell Labs investigation found that Schon had falsified and
fabricated
data. His career as a scientist was finished. Scientific scandals, which are as old as science itself, tend to follow similar patterns of due reward.
In recent years, of course, the pressure on scientists to publish in the top journals has increased, making the journals much more crucial to career success. The questions are whether Nature and Science have become too powerful as arbiters of what science reaches to the public, and whether the journals are up to their task as gatekeepers.
Each scientific specialty has its own set of journals. Physicists have Physical Review Letters, neuroscientists have Neuron, and so forth. Science and Nature, though, are the only two major journals that cover the gamut of scientific disciplines, from meteorology and zoology to quantum physics and chemistry. As a result, journalists look to them each week for
the cream of the crop
of new science papers. And scientists look to the journals in part to reach journalists. Why do they care? Competition for grants has gotten so fierce that scientists have sought popular renown to gain an edge over their rivals. Publication in specialized journals will win the
acclaims
from academics and satisfy the publish-or-perish imperative, but Science and Nature come with the added bonus of potentially getting your paper written up in The New York Times and other publications.
Scientists tend to pay more attention to the big two than to other journals. When more scientists know about a particular paper, they’re more apt to cite it in their own papers. Being oft-cited will increase a scientist’s "Impact Factor", a measure of how often papers are cited by peers. Funding agencies use the "Impact Factor" as a rough measure of the influence of scientists they’re considering supporting. [br] The expression the cream of the crop in Paragraph 3 most likely means "________".
选项
A、the most of all
B、the best of all
C、the recently released
D、the widely spread
答案
B
解析
the cream of the crop是英文俚语,意思为“(某物的)精华”,也就是“最好的”,因此选B项。A项“最多的”、C项“最新发布的”和D项“广泛传播的”均不符合要求。故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304536.html
相关试题推荐
Thestate’splasticbagbanwas100%successful.A、正确B、错误B原文说:Environmentgroup
今年的严打斗争取得了很大的成绩。TheOperationStrikeHardhasbeencrownedwithgreatsuccessth
TheTurtleacres,then,wouldhaveseemedalmostassurroundedastheydoin201
当地建造了一座博物馆,似乎要取代塞弗伦斯音乐厅,成为这座城市音乐生活的中心。(oust…as…)Amuseumopened,andseemedpois
Beingbothspoiledandlazy,he______everyoneelseforhislackofsuccess.A、a
Inourcultureandinoureyessuccessalltoooftenmeanssimplyoutdoingother
Theexpertsays______inperformancecanbeappliedsuccessfullytoapolitical
Ifbeingcarriedoutsuccessfully,theplanwillcompletelychangethetrafficc
Ifbeingcarriedoutsuccessfully,theplanwillcompletelychangethetrafficc
Theexpertsays______inperformancecanbeappliedsuccessfullytoapolitical
随机试题
Market【C1】______donotcomenaturallytoChineseofficials.Forthepastfo
C
蜗杆传动()自锁作用。A.具有 B.不具有 C.有时有 D.以上均不是
化学理论性知识包括化学基本概念和基本原理,下列对其学习策略描述不正确的是()。A
一般而言,()均可应用于企业、部门、班组和岗位四个层面。A.KPI B.PR
关于特别行政区制度,下列哪些说法是不正确的?()(2010年)A.香港特别行政
《中华人民共和国食品安全法》的使用范围有( )。A.食品生产和加工 B.食品
吸收直接投资相较于发行公司债券的优点是()。A.有利于公司治理 B.资本成本
某工程网络计划中,工作N的自由时差为5天,计划执行过程中检查发现,工作N的工作时
按上部结构的行车道位置不同,拱桥可分为()A.高架桥B.下承式桥C.中承式桥
最新回复
(
0
)