首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2023-12-25
21
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] According to Paragraph 2, the likelihood that new dams will be built has decreased because________.
选项
A、construction costs have increased enormously
B、safety standards have become much higher
C、public opposition to dam construction has increased
D、at most suitable sites an existing dam would have to be removed first
答案
C
解析
第2段第3句指出,剩余几个水坝选址处,公众强烈反对,所以不可能获得项目批准,故C项“公众反对大坝修建的呼声越来越高”与此相符。A项“建筑成本越来越高”、B项“安全标准逐渐提高”和D项“最合适的选址处的现有大坝应先被拆除”均不符合题意,可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304421.html
相关试题推荐
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
随机试题
Peoplebornintheautumnlivelongerthanthoseborninthespring.Andth
Atradegroupforliquorretailersputoutapressreleasewithanalarming
施工单位安全资料管理职责包括()。A.逐级建立安全资料管理岗位责任制,明确责任
急性坏死性小肠结肠炎的患儿,不可以经常食用A.肉类 B.甘薯、玉米 C.黄瓜
患者,男性,34岁。1周前左足底被铁钉刺伤,自行包扎,昨夜突感胸闷、紧缩感,晨起
厨房、卫生间墙面必须使用()。A、普通腻子 B、耐水腻子 C、水性腻子 D
与白血病发病有关的病毒是( )。A.呼吸道合胞病毒 B.柯萨奇病毒 C.C
2014年,上海市全年实现金融业增加值3268.43亿元,比上年增长14%。
以下关于税收的作用的理解不正确的是()。A.合理制定不同的税种和税率来调节生产和
实施乡村振兴战略,是党的十九大作出的重大决策部署。按照产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文
最新回复
(
0
)