首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2023-12-25
60
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] According to Paragraph 2, the likelihood that new dams will be built has decreased because________.
选项
A、construction costs have increased enormously
B、safety standards have become much higher
C、public opposition to dam construction has increased
D、at most suitable sites an existing dam would have to be removed first
答案
C
解析
第2段第3句指出,剩余几个水坝选址处,公众强烈反对,所以不可能获得项目批准,故C项“公众反对大坝修建的呼声越来越高”与此相符。A项“建筑成本越来越高”、B项“安全标准逐渐提高”和D项“最合适的选址处的现有大坝应先被拆除”均不符合题意,可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304421.html
相关试题推荐
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
随机试题
Readthearticlebelowabouttheimpendingflu.Choosethebestwordtofilleac
传统中医(traditionalChinesemedicine)可以不借助任何仪器给病人治病,堪称奇迹。Itisawonderthatdoctor
建筑起重机械的安全评亻古适用于建筑工程使用的()等建筑起重机械的安全评估。A.
在闭合性喉外伤的基础上如出现颈部皮下气肿,则提示()A.伤口已转为开
某日16时10分,某厂维修班开始进行连接污油池的污油管线维修作业。16时20分,
客户陈先生,系中国行业类500强企业区域负责人,妻子李女士,42岁,为家庭主妇,
心绞痛处理原则
烧伤后有绿脓杆菌感染时,选用的抗生素是A.竣苄青霉素 B.多粘菌素 C.头孢
不宜过量服用、久服的中成药有A.理中丸 B.附子理中丸 C.良附丸 D.小
下列有关职业怀疑的说法中,正确的有( )。A.职业怀疑要求注册会计师质疑相互矛
最新回复
(
0
)