首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2023-12-25
9
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] According to Paragraph 2, the likelihood that new dams will be built has decreased because________.
选项
A、construction costs have increased enormously
B、safety standards have become much higher
C、public opposition to dam construction has increased
D、at most suitable sites an existing dam would have to be removed first
答案
C
解析
第2段第3句指出,剩余几个水坝选址处,公众强烈反对,所以不可能获得项目批准,故C项“公众反对大坝修建的呼声越来越高”与此相符。A项“建筑成本越来越高”、B项“安全标准逐渐提高”和D项“最合适的选址处的现有大坝应先被拆除”均不符合题意,可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304421.html
相关试题推荐
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
WhilemuchoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaputProhibitiontorest73years
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
NinestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaaredoingawaywiththesalestaxo
随机试题
[audioFiles]audio_eufm_j21_001(20082)[/audioFiles]A、Shedidn’tunderstandwhat
()年,周恩来委托瞿秋白同志起草了《文件处置办法》这是中国共产党最到的关于档案
做一个健康教育计划需要设计者先A.立意 B.调查 C.研究 D.构思 E
参加评标及合同谈判属于业主方的( )任务。A:投资控制 B:质量控制 C:
关于甘油磷脂的合成与降解,不正确的是A:全身各组织细胞内质网均可合成,以肝、肾及
对精神病学的认识正确的是A:在古代医学中,不包含精神病学的内容 B:现代精神病
汗法可用于治疗A.外感表证 B.疹出不畅 C.疮疡初起 D.里热实证
若保持与2009年相同的降幅,北京市在哪一年的万元GDP能耗将降低到0.5
2021年1月1日,《民法典》正式施行。其中,人格权独立成编是民法典的一大亮点。
根据《水利建设项目稽查办法》(水安监【2017】341号),稽查组应在现场结束后
最新回复
(
0
)