首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
游客
2023-12-25
51
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] The author’s attitude towards China’s economic success in Latin America is________.
选项
A、optimistic
B、neutral
C、indifferent
D、negative
答案
D
解析
态度题。最后两段作者对美国与中国在拉美地区的待遇做了对比,前者因其强大的文化影响力遭遇政治抵制,而后者因低调行事反而进展顺利。作为美国人,作者的字里行间反映出其心中的不忿,故正确答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3303979.html
相关试题推荐
Itisdifficulttorefutehisargumentinourroutinedebate.A、analyzeB、ponder
Itisdifficulttorefutehisargumentinourroutinedebate.A、analyzeB、ponder
Acourt-martialhasbutrecentlydecidedtoacquithim.A、declareheisnotguilt
Iknewnothingofthemotivesbehindhisrecentmove,andIdon’tknoweitherth
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Someobserverssaytherecentcoupofamilitarygovernmentinthatcountrywill
Recentresearchintoagingsuggeststhatthebody’sdefensemechanismsmaylose
Recentstudieshaveidentifiedfourmajorglobalenvironmentalrisks;acidrain,
Hisinabilitytolearnforeignlanguageswasa(n)obstacletohiscareer.A、barrie
AlthoughthisbookclaimstobeabiographyofGeorgeWashington,manyofthein
随机试题
[originaltext]M:I’mAviArditti,andthisweekonWordmaster.wehaveaspecia
【S1】[br]【S10】E根据前面的所属格推测这里需要名词,而根据pyramid可以推测应该是construction。
Whatisthepurposeofissuingthenewlaw?[originaltext]LawmakersinNebra
Today,houseworkhasbeenmademucheasierbyelectrical______.A、appliancesB、f
女性,40岁,因患甲亢曾接受”131I治疗,近2年来自觉乏力、畏寒,眼睑及下肢
患儿,10岁。课间活动时,突然两眼凝视,呆立不动,呼之不应,持续约10秒后恢复正
2009年3月1日,王某入职某公司,劳动合同约定每月10日为工资发放日。入职后的
属于大环内酯类抗生素的是A.克拉维酸 B.罗红霉素 C.阿米卡星 D.头孢
下列关于纳税信用管理的表述中,符合规定的是( )。A.非独立核算分支机构可自愿
下列有关财务管理目标的观点中,考虑了所获利润和投入资本数额的关系的有()。A.
最新回复
(
0
)