首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
游客
2023-12-25
46
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] The word "coercive" underlined in Paragraph 2 is synonymous to________.
选项
A、forcible
B、complementary
C、formidable
D、coherent
答案
A
解析
语义题。forcible强迫的,complementary互补的,formidable可怕的,coherent连贯的。coercive意为“强制的,强迫的”,故A为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3303971.html
相关试题推荐
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmu
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Ijuststoppedbyyourofficeinthebank.Theytoldmethaty
操作风险评估的步骤中,属于准备阶段的有( )。A.识别评估对象 B.绘制流程
社区服务具有精神文明建设的功能,体现在()A.培养了居民的文明意识 B
患儿男,7岁。因发热、恶心、呕吐1周,近2天巩膜黄而就诊。出生时注射过乙型肝炎疫
60岁以上的老年人的用药剂量是成年人剂量的A:1/2 B:2/3 C:3/4
能够从上述材料中推出的是:A.2021年全国普通高校毕业生人数超过201
某广告牌上需安装特殊的艺术字模型,大字价格是小字价格的2倍,而大字字数是小字字数
A.骨损伤 B.高原病 C.急性胰腺炎 D.剧烈运动 E.肥胖症淀粉酶增
下列各项中,能够成为法律关系主体的有()。A.甲市财政局 B.大学生张某
按照流动负债产生的原因,下列负债中.由于利润分配而产生的流动负债是()。
最新回复
(
0
)