首页
登录
职称英语
The second little pig was unlucky. He built his house from sticks. It was bl
The second little pig was unlucky. He built his house from sticks. It was bl
游客
2023-12-25
20
管理
问题
The second little pig was unlucky. He built his house from sticks. It was blown away by a huffing, puffing wolf, which promptly gobbled him up. His brother, by contrast, built a wolf- proof house from bricks. The fairy tale could have been written by a
flack
for the construction industry, which strongly favours brick, concrete and steel. However, in the real world it would help reduce pollution and slow global warming if more builders copied the wood-loving second pig.
In 2015 world leaders meeting in Paris agreed to move towards zero net greenhouse-gas emissions in the second half of this century. That is a
tall order
, and the building industry makes it even taller. Cement-making alone produces 6% of the world’s carbon emissions. Steel, half of which goes into buildings, accounts for another 8%. If you factor in all of the energy that goes into lighting, heating and cooling homes and offices, the world’s buildings start to look like a giant environmental problem.
Governments in the rich world are now trying to promote greener behaviour by obliging developers to build new projects to "zero carbon" standards. From January 1st 2019 all new public-sector buildings in the European Union must be built to "nearly zero-energy" standards. All other types of buildings will follow in January 2021. Governments in eight further countries are being lobbied to introduce a similar policy.
These standards are less green than they seem. Wind turbines and solar panels on top of buildings look good but are much less productive than wind and solar farms. And the standards only count the emissions from running a building, not those belched out when it was made.
Those
are thought to account for between 30% and 60% of the total over a structure’s lifetime.
Buildings can become greener. They can use more recycled steel and can be prefabricated in off-site factories, greatly reducing lorry journeys. But no other building material has environmental credentials as exciting and overlooked as wood.
The energy required to produce a laminated wooden beam is one-sixth of that required for a steel one of comparable strength. As trees take carbon out of the atmosphere when growing, wooden buildings contribute to negative emissions by storing the stuff. When a mature tree is cut down, a new one can be planted to replace it, capturing more carbon. After buildings are demolished, old beams and panels are easy to recycle into new structures. And for retrofitting older buildings to be more energy efficient, wood is a good insulator. A softwood window frame provides nearly 400 times as much insulation as a plain steel one of the same thickness and over a thousand times as much as an aluminum equivalent.
A race is on to build the world’s tallest fully wooden skyscraper. But such edifices are still uncommon. Industry fragmentation, vicious competition for contracts and low profit margins mean that most building firms have little money to invest in greener construction methods beyond what regulation dictates.
Governments can help nudge the industry to use more wood, particularly in the public sector—the construction industry’s biggest client. That would help wood-building specialists achieve greater scale and lower costs. Zero-carbon building regulations should be altered to take account of the emissions that are embodied in materials. This would favour wood as well as innovative ways of producing other materials.
Construction codes could be tweaked to make building with wood easier. Here the direction of travel is wrong. Britain, for instance, is banning the use of timber on the outside of tall buildings after 72 people died in a tower fire in London in 2017. That is a nonsense.
Grenfell Tower was covered in aluminum and plastic, not wood. Modern cross-laminated timber panels perform better in fire tests than steel ones do.
Carpentry alone will not bring the environmental cost of the world’s buildings into line. But using wood can do much more than is appreciated. The second little pig was not wrong, just before his time.
(选自《经济学人》2019年1月5日) [br] What does the word "Those" underlined in Paragraph 4 refer to?
选项
A、Wind turbines and solar panels.
B、Emissions during the construction of a building.
C、The standards of emissions.
D、Emissions after a building being put into use.
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据上下语义,可知下画线的Those是指前文的those belched out when it was made,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3303653.html
相关试题推荐
Whatisthemainfindingofthestudy?A、Itfoundlittleclear-cutevidencethat
AgrowingnumberofAmericansarebuyingsecond-handclothes.[originaltext]
Womenwhowalkalittleoverthreekilometerseachdaymightlivelongerthanle
Untilrecently,scientistsknewlittleaboutlifeinthedeepsea,norhadt
Untilrecently,scientistsknewlittleaboutlifeinthedeepsea,norhadt
It’satypicalSnoopycard;cheerfulmessage,brightcolors,thoughalittle
Myentirelifehasbeenlivedinthehealthyareabetweentoolittleandtoomuc
Today,virtuallyallofAmerica’smorethan3,000post-secondaryinstitutions,f
Pourwaterhastilyintoavesselwithanarrowneck,andlittleenters;butpour
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,such
随机试题
未采用吊架进行预制构件起吊时,绳索与构件水平面的夹角不宜小于()。A.40°
公司企业法人的法人机关中,执行机关是( )。A.股东(大)会 B.董事会
变通监控分中心的功能是()。A.信息收集功能 B.信息分析处理功能 C.宏
图示结构EI=常数,在给定荷载作用下剪力QAB为:
A.壁虎科B.鲍科C.钜蚓科D.芫青科E.鳖蠊科石决明来源于
我国社会主义道德建设的基本原则是( )A.集体主义 B.合理利己主义 C.
下列关于K线图的说法中,正确的有()。A.K线图又称为蜡烛图 B.如果是1天
被告人王某在境外,没有参加国内某中院的缺席审判。缺席审判结束,交付执行刑罚前,人
(2016年真题)甲企业从境外进口一批高档化妆品,下列关于该业务征缴消费税的表述
下列各项中,属于非系统风险的是( )。A.由于利率上升而导致的价格风险 B.
最新回复
(
0
)