首页
登录
职称英语
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inaya
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inaya
游客
2023-12-24
44
管理
问题
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly varied outlooks on tomorrow’s universities by writers representing both Western and non-Western perspectives. Their essays raise a broad range of issues, questioning nearly every key assumption we have about higher education today.
The most widely discussed alternative to the traditional campus is the Internet University— a voluntary community to scholars/teachers physically scattered throughout a country or around the world but all linked in cyberspace. A computerized university could have many advantages, such as easy scheduling, efficient delivery of lectures to thousands or even millions of students at once, and ready access for students everywhere to the resources of all the world’s great libraries.
Yet the Internet University poses dangers, too. For example, a line of franchised courseware, produced by a few superstar teachers, marketed under the brand name of a famous institution, and heavily advertised, might eventually come to dominate the global education market, warns sociology professor Peter Manicas of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Besides enforcing a rigidly standardized curriculum, such a "college education in a box" could undersell the offerings of many traditional brick and mortar institutions, effectively driving them out of business and throwing thousands of career academics out of work, note Australian communications professors David Rooney and Greg Hearn.
On the other hand, while global connectivity seems highly likely to play some significant role in future higher education, that does not mean greater uniformity in course content—or other dangers—will necessarily follow. Counter-movements are also at work.
Many in academia, including scholars contributing to this volume, are questioning the fundamental mission of university education. What if, for instance, instead of receiving primarily technical training and building theft individual careers, university students and professors could focus their learning and research efforts on existing problems in their local communities and the world? Feminist scholar Ivana Milojevic dares to dream what a university might become "if we believed that child-care workers and teachers in early childhood education should be one of the highest (rather than lowest) paid professionals?"
Co-editor Jennifer Gidley shows how tomorrow’s university faculty, instead of giving lectures and conducting independent research, may take on three new roles. Some would act as brokers, assembling customized degree-credit programmes for individual students by mixing and matching the best course offerings available from institutions all around the world. A second group, mentors, would function much like today’s faculty advisers, but are likely to be working with many more students outside their own academic specialty. This would require them to constantly be learning from their students as well as instructing them.
A third new role for faculty, and in Gidley’s view the most challenging and rewarding of all, would be as meaning-makers: charismatic sages and practitioners leading groups of students/colleagues in collaborative efforts to find spiritual as well as rational and technological solutions to specific real-world problems.
Moreover, there seems little reason to suppose that any one form of university must necessarily drive out all other options. Students may be "enrolled" in courses offered at virtual campuses on the Internet, between—or even during—sessions at a real-world problem-focused institution.
As co-editor Sohail Inayatullah points out in his introduction, no future is inevitable, and the very act of imagining and thinking through alternative possibilities can directly affect how thoughtfully, creatively and urgently even a dominant technology is adapted and applied. Even in academia, the future belongs to those who care enough to work their visions into practical, sustainable realities. [br] Which of the following is NOT seen as a potential danger of the Internet University?
选项
A、Internet-based courses may be less costly than traditional ones.
B、Teachers in traditional institutions may lose their jobs.
C、Internet-based courseware may lack variety in course content.
D、The Internet University may produce teachers with a lot of publicity.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3300019.html
相关试题推荐
Whenhefirststartedinuniversity,hismajoreconomicsbewilderedhimtremendo
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunityt
Thiscountryisinthesocialtransformationperiodnow,andthesocialtransfor
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939and
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939and
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939and
随机试题
ThelatterchoicecanwellhelpPresidentObama’sre-electionasithelpedthat
[originaltext]I’mMr.Britain,theheadlibrarian,andtodayI’dliketoin
TheAustralianstateofVictoriaisinvestinginaprogramtoidentifynewo
被害人承诺,是指权利人同意或者要求损害其某种合法权益的行为。该行为表明权利人自愿
地面与空中、地面与地下立体交叉使用土地的(楼房除外),土地使用权确定给( )。
胆固醇合成的原料是A:氨基酸 B:乙酰CoA C:丙酮酸 D:甘油 E:
一横波沿绳子传播时的波动方程为y=0.05cos(4πx-10πt)(SI
湿式自动喷水灭火系统的温度适用范围为()℃。A.4-70 B.0-68 C
当药物进入体循环以后,能迅速向体内各组织器官分布,并很快在血液与各组织脏器之间达
骨软骨瘤的临床表现为A.局部肿胀、浅表静脉怒张 B.多发于手的管状骨 C.夜
最新回复
(
0
)