首页
登录
职称英语
Family Matters This month Singapore pass
Family Matters This month Singapore pass
游客
2023-12-20
23
管理
问题
Family Matters
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Singapore Government.
That does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure as un-Asian. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will subvert relations within the family; cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. The law cannot legislate filial responsibility any more than it can legislate love. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Singapore needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to shore it up.
Like many other developed nations, Singapore faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is inexorable. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By the turn of the century, that figure will grow to 11%. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age per se. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family. This is not a revolutionary concept. Nor is it uniquely Asian. Care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized Societies.
The problem in Singapore is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what of the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support7 They have several options: (a) get a job and work until they die; (b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or (c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept; Asian nations from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits mixes the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s -- not society’s -- responsibility to look after his parents. Singapore is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea. It rein-forces the traditional values and it doesn’t hurt a society now and then to remind itself of its core values.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice. Until now, if a person asked family elders, clergymen or the Ministry of Community Development to help get financial support from his children, the most they could do was to mediate. But mediators have no teeth, and a child could simply ignore their pleas.
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace. Few people would be so thick - skinned as to say, "Sue and be damned". The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened. It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the recalcitrant son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.
It would be nice to think that Singapore doesn’t need this kind of law. But that belief ignores the clear demographic trends and the effect of affluence itself on traditional bonds. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an’ incentive not to have it invoked in the first place. [br] By quoting the growing percentage points of the aged in the population, the author seems to imply that _____.
选项
A、the country will face mounting problems of the old in future.
B、the social welfare system would be under great pressure.
C、young people should be given more moral education.
D、the old should be provided with means of livelihood.
答案
A
解析
随着人口的老龄化,老人的赡养问题也更突出。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3290187.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]ThetraditionalAmericanfamilyusedtohaveaworkingfather
[originaltext]ThetraditionalAmericanfamilyusedtohaveaworkingfather
[originaltext]ThetraditionalAmericanfamilyusedtohaveaworkingfather
Thewaythingsarelooking,theroyalfamilywillneedtostartbulkbuying
FamilyMatters1ThismonthSingapor
AccordingtoDr.Neil,inwhatwayisfamilylifedifferentnow?[br][original
AccordingtoDr.Neil,inwhatwayisfamilylifedifferentnow?[br][original
AccordingtoDr.Neil,inwhatwayisfamilylifedifferentnow?[br][original
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsan
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsan
随机试题
WhatisCulture?Culture,inanthropology(人类学),the
A、Tworooms.B、Threerooms.C、Fiverooms.D、Sixrooms.C问题问的是男士订了几个房间。根据男士所说Two
Awisemanoncesaidthattheonlythingnecessaryforthetriumphofevi
小学音乐《大家一起来》主要教学过程及板书设计 (一)教学过程 1.导入新课 欣赏孙悦演唱《大家一起来》视频,导入新课教学。 2.学唱歌曲 (1)初听
基金信息披露的最根本、最重要的原则是( )原则。A.时效性 B.重要性 C
人们看到别人处于紧急状态情境中而不去救援,不是由于人性的丧失,而是由于其他人在场
这种基于网络的信息流却有着自身的致命缺陷,那就是确保信息的真实性存在难度。由于缺
在无地基失效情况下,下列关于场地与建筑物震害关系的说法正确的是()。A.在覆
防火防爆安全装置分为阻火隔爆装置和防爆卸压装置两大类。下列关于阻火器类型的说法中
下述关于二尖瓣关闭不全患者早期病理生理改变的叙述,正确的是A.左心房压力负荷增加
最新回复
(
0
)