首页
登录
职称英语
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
游客
2023-12-17
35
管理
问题
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in which those who consume its product do not purchase it; those who produce it do not sell it, and those who finance it do not control it. That apt description, made in the 1970s, has been undermined since then by the emergence of the first for-profit universities in the United States. Controlled by entrepreneurs, these schools which number about 700 and counting sell a practical education to career-minded students and make a good buck doing it. They are now expanding abroad, creating the first multinational corporations in a sector long suspicious of balance sheets.
The companies are lured by a booming market in which capitalist competition is still scarce. The num her of university students is expected to double in the next 25 years to 170 million worldwide. Demand greatly exceeds supply, because the 1990s saw massive global investment in primary and secondary schools, but not in universities. The number of children enrolled in primary or secondary schools rose by 18 percent around the world--more than twice the rate of increase in any previous decade. Now these kids are often graduating from high school to find no openings in national universities, which nevertheless don’t welcome for-profit competition. The Brazilian university teachers’ union warned that foreign corporations would turn higher education into "a diploma industry". Critics raised the specter of declining quality and a loss of Brazil’s "sovereign control" over education.
For-profit universities met with similar suspicion when they first opened in the United States. By the 1980s they were regularly accused of offering substandard education and had to fight for acceptance and respect. Lately, they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties, just a shortcut to a better career. For-profit colleges now attract 8 percent of four-year students in the United States, up from 3 percent a decade ago. By cutting out frills, including sports teams, student centers and summer vacation, these schools can operate with profit margins of 20 to 30 percent.
In some countries, the American companies operate as they do at home. Apollo found an easy fit in Brazil, where few universities have dorms, students often take off time between high school and college, and there’s no summer vacation--just two breaks in July and December. In other Latin countries, Sylvan has taken a different approach, buying traditional residential colleges like the Universidad del Valle de Mexico (UVM). It has boosted enrollment by adding and heavily advertising courses in career-track fields like business and engineering, and adding no-frills satellite campuses. Sensitive to the potential hostility against foreign buyers, Sylvan keeps original school names, adding its own brand, Sylvan International Universities, to publicity materials, and keeps tuition in line with local private schools.
Most of the schools that Sylvan has purchased were managed by for-profits to begin with, including the prestigious Les Roches Hotel Management School in Switzerland. But in general, Says Urdan, Sylvan’s targets "have not been run with world-class business practices. They’re not distressed, but there’s an opportunity for them to be better managed." When Sylvan paid $ 50 million for a controlling stake in UVM two years ago, the school had revenues of about $ 80 million and an enrollment of 32,000. The success of the for-profits is nothing to be afraid of, says World Bank education expert Jamil Salmi: "I don’t think they will replace traditional universities, but they can push some more traditional providers to be more innovative and more attentive to the needs of the labor market."
Some students at Sylvan schools in Latin America welcome the foreign invasion. At the Universidad de las Americas in Santiago, Daniela Villagran says friends tease her for studying at "Yankeeland," but she figures Sylvan connections "will give me an edge when I go out to look for a job. "The emphasis on in dependent thought is what separates UVM from other institutions in Mexico. And, for better or worse, more American schools are on the way. [br] Recently, for-profits universities have been favored by older people because ______.
选项
A、the teaching methods are appropriate to them.
B、they provide short-term training programs.
C、they can secure them a brighter future.
D、they can enable them to get higher salaries.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干中的older students定位至第三段。第三句指出:Lately,they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties,just a shortcut to a better career.[C]符合文意,故为答案。[A]和[B]与内容无关,排除。这里说的是a better career.并不一定意味着higher salaries,[D]不符合文意,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3282215.html
相关试题推荐
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysa
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysa
WhichdoesNOTbelongtothejudicialsystemsprovidedbytheAmericanFederalG
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
Divorceandout-of-wedlockchildbirtharetransformingthelivesofAmerican
[originaltext]INTERVIEWER:WhatdoEasternandWesternfamilyeducationsharei
随机试题
______isnoreasonfordismissingher.A、BecauseshewasafewminuteslateB、Owi
PartyTimeAmericansplanparties【T1】______.Asinothercultures,many
TheofficialnameoftheUnitedKingdomis______.A、theUnitedKingdomofGreatB
[originaltext]W:Hmm,hi.M:Hi,Iamgoingdoortodoortonighttotellpeople
以下有关缺乏控制权的股权投资评估程序的说法中,正确的有()。A.单独评估时
导游服务的经济性体现在( )。A.有偿服务,直接创收 B.口头宣传,扩大客源
某混凝土试块强度值不满足规范要求,但经法定检测单位对混凝土实体强度经过法定检测后
陈小姐,19岁。因转移性右下腹痛伴恶心、食欲下降8h来诊。体格检查:体温37.8
(2020年真题)下列抽样调查方法中,属于概率抽样的有()A.系统抽样
下列有关筛选化学致癌物的短期致突变试验的描述中错误的是A.在组合试验中有一项是阳
最新回复
(
0
)