首页
登录
职称英语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week includ
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week includ
游客
2023-12-16
79
管理
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、United Jewish Communities is sponsored by a single company
B、population surveys by United Jewish Communities are important in shaping community policy of the Jewish in America
C、the researchers did their job with nigh responsibility
D、American Jewish reject full integration into society
答案
B
解析
第四段:Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy.本题亦可用排除法排除三个错误选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3277981.html
相关试题推荐
Thethreatfromglobalwarming,hereports,"Isveryreal.Itisonlyamatte
[originaltext]Newevidencesuggestsfoursuicidebombers,includingatleast
Accordingtothenews,Iranisaskingfor______.[originaltext]IranianPresi
Accordingtothenews,Iranisaskingfor______.[originaltext]IranianPresi
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECT?A、TheBritishconstitutioninclud
Accordingtothepassage,mostIcelandersviewlandassomethingof______.[br]
Accordingtothepassage,mostIcelandersviewlandassomethingof______.[br]
Accordingtothepassage,mostIcelandersviewlandassomethingof______.[br]
Accordingtothepassage,rickshawsareused,inKolkatamainlyforthefollowin
AccordingtoDr.Johnson,diversitymeans______.[br][originaltext]W:Theword
随机试题
ReadthefollowingarticleaboutaBritishbusinessmanandthequestions.Forea
Mattcheachstatementwiththecorrectperson,A-G.Writethecorrectle
【B1】[br]【B2】even∧there→though本题考查词语使用及逻辑关系。首先even一词可以作副词,形容词和动词,但是不能作为连接词,因此两个
WhichofthefollowingnovelistswroteTheSoundandtheFuryA、WilliamFaulkner.
Atthebeginningherefusedtotakeanyresponsibilitybuthehadtoendupby__
中国目前仍面临着人口多、资源少的严峻现实。鉴于中国目前的资源储备(resourcereserve),很多人认为我们仍要继续实行计划生育政策(theo
未经请假离校连续()未参加学校规定教学活动可作退学处理。A.一周 B.二周
按燃烧方式不同,锅炉可分为层燃炉、室燃炉、旋风炉和流化床燃烧锅炉。下列不同类型锅
患者男性,69岁,右上缺失,健康,近中舌侧倾斜,牙槽嵴丰满,上颌散在骨尖,牙合间
下列有关在细节测试中确定样本规模的说法中,错误的是( )。A.误受风险与审计的效
最新回复
(
0
)