首页
登录
职称英语
The trade and investment relationship between the European Union and the Unite
The trade and investment relationship between the European Union and the Unite
游客
2023-12-16
45
管理
问题
The trade and investment relationship between the European Union and the United States is the most important in the world. Despite the emergence of competitors, Europe and America are the dynamo of the global economy.
This economic relationship is a foundation of our political partnership, which we all know has been through a difficult patch. The identity of interest between Europe and America is less obvious than during the cold war. But while the trans-Atlantic relationship is becoming more complex, that does not make it less important. As European commissioner for trade, I do not agree that European and American values are fundamentally diverging, or that our interests no longer coincide.
We still share a belief in democracy and individual freedoms, and in creating opportunity and economic openness. We face the same security challenges. We look ahead to shared global problems: poverty, migration, resource crises, climate change.
We need commitment and vision to redefine our relationship. I want to see a stronger and more balanced partnership -- one in which Europe is more united, more willing to take its role in global leadership and one where the United States is more inclined to share leadership with Europe. We need to find ways to complement each other, not compete in the political arena.
We will not achieve either side of this equation without the other. Europe needs to build stronger foreign policies and to be ready to act on the world stage. But equally, the body language we see from America has a huge impact on how Europeans view the partnership. Our common interest requires a strong Europe, not a weak and divided one. I hope that the United States will reinforce its historical support for European integration.
I am fortunate now to take over an area of policy in which Europe is highly effective: trade. Our top trade priority on both sides of the Atlantic must be to put our weight behind the multilateral Doha development agenda. Concluding this negotiation in a way that lives up to its ambition will bring enormous benefits.
Collectively, we took a major step in reaching the framework agreement in Geneva last July, following the lead taken by the E. U. on agriculture export subsidies. We now look to the United States and others to follow that lead, and we need to accelerate work in other areas -- on industrial tariffs and services -- to achieve a balanced result.
The Doha round of talks differs from any other in its focus on development. Europe and the United States must ensure that poorer countries are fully engaged and derive benefits. But the issues we need to tackle to stimulate growth and innovation in trans-Atlantic trade are not those on the Doha agenda. Our markets are relatively open and highly developed. We need to concentrate on removing regulatory and structural barriers that inhibit activity. This is about cutting international red tape. Our regulatory systems and cultures are different, but that is where real gains can be made.
As E. U. trade commissioner I want to develop an ambitious but practical trans-Atlantic agenda. I am not inclined to set rhetorical targets or launch lofty initiatives. I want a set of achievable goals.
Work on trans-Atlantic deregulation will also contribute to the central goal of the new European Commission: promoting growth and jobs in Europe.
I am not naive. I am not turning a blind eye to the inevitable disputes in trans-Atlantic trade. They are relatively small as a proportion of total trade, but they make the headlines. They reflect the huge volume of our trade and investment flows. That is good. They also reflect our readiness to settle disputes in the World Trade Organization. That is also good. The WTO is the best example of effective multilateralism that the world has so far invented. I hope we will work together to uphold it. If multilateralism is to be worthwhile, it has to be effective -- and that goes for every part of the relationship between Europe and America. [br] Why does the author long for the U.S. ’s support for European integration?
选项
A、Because this is the need of both sides’ interests.
B、Because the U. S. has long had a good relationship with Europe.
C、Because the U. S. always takes its role in global leadership.
D、Because this could help build a strong partnership.
答案
A
解析
推断题。第五段倒数第二句说道:“我们共同的利益需要一个强大的欧洲,而不是一个脆弱、分散的欧洲”,由此推断,作者希望美国支持欧洲融合是因为这是双方利益的需要,可见 A正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3277933.html
相关试题推荐
WhendidthecountryofficiallyentertheEuropeanUnion?[originaltext]TheM
SincejoiningtheEuropeanEconomicCommunityin______,Britainhasadoptedthe
InT.G,thestructurethatcontainsalltheunitandrelationshipsthatarenece
[originaltext]InFinland,peacetalksbetweentheIndonesiangovernmentand
ThefirstAsaninvestmentbankerspecializinginmergersandacquisitions,F
ThefirstAsaninvestmentbankerspecializinginmergersandacquisitions,F
Sapir-Whorf’shypothesismeditateontherelationshipbetween______.A、languagea
Patents,saidThomasJefferson,shoulddraw"alinebetweenthethingswhich
Patents,saidThomasJefferson,shoulddraw"alinebetweenthethingswhich
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsa
随机试题
Mostofusfindtheforgettingeasier,butmaybeweshouldworkontheforgi
______allcustoms,nomatterhowsacrosanct,areessentiallylearnedreactionsa
Newresearchhasfoundthatthosewhowork11-hourdaysormoreincreasethe
Wehavetoworkevenharderthoughwefeelquite______oursuccess.A、secureof
根据《普通高等学校辅导员培训规划》,到()年,基本形成适应高等教育发展需要、符合
一个美式股票买入期权(CALLOPTION)在期限内某时刻的期权报价是$3.5
某商品流通企业为了扩大销售额,选定了四种方案,四种方案所需费用与可能得到销售额的
估价技术报告应包括()等。A.估价测算过程 B.估价基本事项 C.估价
不利于前后各个期间的预算衔接,不能适应连续不断的业务活动过程的预算管理方法是(
防洪标准是指根据防洪保护对象的重要性和经济合理性而由( )确定的防御洪水标准。
最新回复
(
0
)