首页
登录
职称英语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
游客
2023-12-15
7
管理
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing. [br] What does "buttress" mean in the third paragraph?
选项
A、contradict
B、doubt
C、are unrelated to
D、support
答案
D
解析
文章第三段中“buttress”的意思是?原文第二段中the“me/morn”circuit的发现,表明文化背景和价值观会改变大脑结构。所以第三段中的“buttress”应该指“支持、强化”之意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3275284.html
相关试题推荐
Whentheendoftheworldcomes,we’llknowwhattoblame.Scientistshavefou
Whentheendoftheworldcomes,we’llknowwhattoblame.Scientistshavefou
Whentheendoftheworldcomes,we’llknowwhattoblame.Scientistshavefou
KimiyukiSudashouldbeaperfectcustomerforJapan’scarmakers.He’sayoung
KimiyukiSudashouldbeaperfectcustomerforJapan’scarmakers.He’sayoung
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Patents,saidThomasJefferson,shoulddraw"alinebetweenthethingswhicha
随机试题
Theyaresuperstitionsattachedtonumbers;eventhoseancientGreeksbelieved
阅读下述说明,回答问题1至问题3,将解答填入答题纸的对应栏内。【说明】A公司是从
人际交流中的反馈形式有()A.语言反馈 B.体语反馈 C.负面反馈
某三跨连续梁桥进行定期检查,经综合技术状况评定后,该桥评定为四类桥。结合上题内容
下列不是属于创业投资基金的是()A.不投资在公开市场上市的企业,但是所投资未上
下列不是狂犬病传染源的是A.狂犬病的犬 B.狂犬病的猫 C.狂犬病的狼 D
治头痛无论风寒、风热、风湿、血瘀、血虚均可选用的药是A.川芎B.白芷C.菊花D.
根据《地下铁道工程施工及验收规范》的有关规定,隧道采用钻爆法施工时,必须事先编制
系统溶剂分离法采取的溶剂,其极性顺序是A、从大到小 B、从小到大 C、先从大
患者,男性,21岁,主因口服农药4小时入院,查体时发现患者意识不清,口吐白沫,大
最新回复
(
0
)