首页
登录
职称英语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
游客
2023-12-15
40
管理
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing. [br] What does "buttress" mean in the third paragraph?
选项
A、contradict
B、doubt
C、are unrelated to
D、support
答案
D
解析
文章第三段中“buttress”的意思是?原文第二段中the“me/morn”circuit的发现,表明文化背景和价值观会改变大脑结构。所以第三段中的“buttress”应该指“支持、强化”之意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3275284.html
相关试题推荐
Whentheendoftheworldcomes,we’llknowwhattoblame.Scientistshavefou
Whentheendoftheworldcomes,we’llknowwhattoblame.Scientistshavefou
Whentheendoftheworldcomes,we’llknowwhattoblame.Scientistshavefou
KimiyukiSudashouldbeaperfectcustomerforJapan’scarmakers.He’sayoung
KimiyukiSudashouldbeaperfectcustomerforJapan’scarmakers.He’sayoung
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Itisthenewsthatallslothshavebeenwaitingfor.ScientistsinGermanyha
Patents,saidThomasJefferson,shoulddraw"alinebetweenthethingswhicha
随机试题
WhatdoyouknowaboutMr.Luoafterreading?[br]Canyouguessthemeaningof
Whatdoescommunityservicemean?[originaltext]Theideaofhelpingpeople
下列方程中代表单叶双曲面的是:
下列关于病原体的基本特征说法错误的是()。A.毒力强调的是感染导致疾病的严重
男性,74岁,吃拌凉菜后腹泻水样便每日3~4次,嗜睡1天,经门诊入院,既往有糖尿
下列属于深孔爆破优点的是()。A.爆破时比较安全 B.爆破效果好 C.比较
培训课程计划的内容主要包括()。A.培训目标的选择 B.培训范围的确定 C
(2021年11月真题)某期货公司的期末净资本为5000万元,风险资本准备为55
一般来说,期货头寸持有的时间段要与现货市场承担风险的时间段对应起来,才能实现套期
A市人民医院,国家三级甲等医院,已取得《麻醉药品、第一类精神药品购用印鉴卡》。注
最新回复
(
0
)