2. 职称英语
  3. Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for Bin Laden—from 9/11 to Abbottabad. By Peter

Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for Bin Laden—from 9/11 to Abbottabad. By Peter

游客2023-12-15  9
问题     Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for Bin Laden—from 9/11 to Abbottabad. By Peter Bergen. Crown; 384 pages; $26. Bodley Head; Pounds 20
    A compelling account of the hunt for Osama bin Laden requires two things: captivating detail about how the mission was carried out and answers to difficult questions that linger over the affair. Peter Bergen, a former television journalist who once met the al-Qaeda leader, has an eye for memorable close-ups. His narrative has authority, though at times it seems overly influenced by the American officials who granted the author close access.
    "Manhunt" is packed with satisfying observations. Mr Bergen got into bin Laden’s last home, a compound in Abbottabad, northern Pakistan, before it was demolished in February. He describes the hideaway’s dark rooms and gives a good sense of how the most-wanted man spent his final years.
    Much of bin Laden’s life seems to have been tediously suburban. He was a meticulous note-taker and, says Mr Bergen, had only once told a joke. His many wives were often jealous and sometimes miserable. A notoriously stingy leader, in the end he was so hard up he could hardly pay his staff. The household of 11 adults plus children subsisted on two goats a week, honey from a hive in the garden and Quaker Oats from a local shop. Investigators also found Avena syrup, "a sort of natural Viagra made from wild oats".
    Mr Bergen’s account of bin Laden’s pursuers is also highly readable. Having tracked a suspected al-Qaeda courier known as "the Kuwaiti" to Abbottabad late in 2010, American spies sat for six months and watched. Using drones, they studied the occupants and counted laundry on the washing line to guess how many adults lived in the house. Their suspicions were raised by rubbish that was burned in the yard, not thrown out; the lack of an internet connection in an expensive home; residents who shunned local contact. Of most interest was a mysterious figure, "the pacer", who took morning walks in his garden, beneath a large tarpaulin.
    Barack Obama is now making much of his brave decision to send soldiers to get their quarry, rather than the easier choice of dropping a bomb. Mr Bergen paints a very positive picture of the president, his staff and all involved in the hunt. Even a helicopter crash on the night of the raid did not upset the American Navy Seals’ efficient attack. They killed bin Laden (arrest and trial were hardly considered) and all the other adult males in the building, entering and leaving Pakistani territory without warning or resistance.
    All this, and some crisp writing, keep the pages turning briskly. But Mr Bergen’s book at times falls short. A more critical writer would have paid more attention not only to the hunt, but also to the question of why bin Laden could evade capture for so many years. Crucially, did any Pakistani official, perhaps a rogue agent in the notorious Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) agency, protect him? This matters: if bin Laden was in effect in an ISI safe house, it would help explain why Pakistan-America relations have grown so dangerously confrontational over the past 18 months.
    Much circumstantial evidence hints at Pakistan’s complicity. Bin Laden and his extended family spent more than five years in a military town packed with retired generals. Relatively slack personal security (he had no guards and his family used mobile phones) suggests he felt at ease, perhaps protected by others. His house was less than a mile from Pakistan’s most prestigious military academy, and neighbours tell of regular checks of their homes by security men. American leaders, such as Hillary Clinton, had previously said that Pakistanis might be sheltering him, just as they protect leaders of the Afghan Taliban. Mr Obama refused to warn the Pakistani authorities of the raid.
    Yet Mr Bergen firmly rejects the idea of official Pakistani complicity, and adds that analysis of material found in the hideout offers no evidence otherwise. He does not pause to describe how Pakistan’s military insiders have often collaborated with extremists. Nor does he mention a humiliating al-Qaeda attack on a naval base in Karachi weeks after bin Laden’s assassination—the suspicion is that this too was helped by Pakistani insiders. Mr Bergen’s book is full of detail, but it skips too fast over the tricky, Pakistani side of the story. The full version has yet to be written.
                                                 From The Economist, May 5, 2012 [br] Which of the following can best describe the author’s opinion toward Peter Bergen’s book?
选项 A、Highly readable but lack of details of Bin Laden’s life in Pakistan.
B、Authoritative and quite neutral.
C、Rather compelling but no specific analysis of Bin Laden’s successful evading in Pakistan.
D、Crisp writing and never falling short.
答案 C
解析 本题为态度题。要求回答本文的作者对Peter Bergen这本书的看法。选项A，可读性强，但是缺乏本·拉登在巴基斯坦生活的细节。从文章的第三段的描述中是可以看出本·拉登在巴基斯坦的生活状况的，所以不正确；选项B，有权威性且非常中立。从文章第二段中可以看出，His narrative has authority，但是从接下来部分可以看出，他采访本·拉登是有美国当局默认的，而且在其书中，这种官方的色彩是会从字里行间中表露出来的，所以不能说是完全中立的；选项C，引人人胜但是缺乏对本·拉登长时间隐匿在巴基斯坦的原因的分析，正确；D选项，描述干净利落，而且详尽没有缺憾。题中fall short表示缺乏，达不到目标等意义。从文章来看，Peter Bergen没有能够全面分析一些相关原因。从文章最后“The full version has yet to be written”也可以看出本文作者认为这本书不够全面。综上所述，本题应该选择C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3274399.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)