首页
登录
职称英语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
游客
2023-12-14
10
管理
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliché that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3+ 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West Conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing. [br] What does "buttress" mean in the third paragraph?
选项
A、contradict
B、doubt
C、are unrelated to
D、support
答案
D
解析
原文第二段中the“me/mom”circuit的发现,表明文化背景和价值观会改变大脑结构。所以第三段中的“buttress”应该指“支持、强化”之意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3272617.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]M:Thoughshouldchocolateloverseverywhereberejoicingtoday,
[originaltext]M:Thoughshouldchocolateloverseverywhereberejoicingtoday,
[originaltext]M:Thoughshouldchocolateloverseverywhereberejoicingtoday,
IftheFederationofAmericanScientistsmadealistofeducationalvideogame
[originaltext]InterviewwithPAULRAY:AD:HowdidyoudiscovertheCulturalCr
[originaltext]InterviewwithPAULRAY:AD:HowdidyoudiscovertheCulturalCr
[originaltext]InterviewwithPAULRAY:AD:HowdidyoudiscovertheCulturalCr
JonasFrisenhad’hiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedt
JonasFrisenhad’hiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedt
JonasFrisenhad’hiseurekamomentin1997.Backthen,scientistssuspectedt
随机试题
Womenemployeesworkharderandlongerthanmendo,accordingtoanewstudy
Text3Thereareplentyofgoodreasons
采用混凝土砌块砌筑拱形管渠或管渠的弯道时,宜采用楔形或扇形砌块;当砌体垂直灰缝宽
一项中国老年收缩期高血压临床随机对照试验结果显示,随访4年后,降压治疗组脑卒中的
下列属于权利型无形资产的有()。A.租赁权 B.特许经营权 C.专卖权
判断疾病、辨识证候的主要依据为()。A.环境 B.证候 C.病 D.
二、三类变电站变压器、断路器、GIS等主设备的重要状态量发生变化时应立即上报(
某市地铁N号线工程,业主与某铁道设计院签订了勘察设计委托合同,合同任务包括勘察,
2012年12月,某公司对县税务局确定的企业所得税的应纳税所得额、应纳税额及在1
税收的本质是一种()。A.分配关系 B.投资关系 C.被投资关系 D
最新回复
(
0
)