首页
登录
职称英语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s sto
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s sto
游客
2023-12-14
37
管理
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent. [br] Which of the following is NOT the benefit of immigration?
选项
A、Immigration will help the economy grow and increase the total number of jobs.
B、Immigration will increase the wages and decrease the prices of goods.
C、Immigration will make skilled native workers face even tougher competition.
D、Immigration will attract the most talented people to the country.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、B和D分别可从第五段、第七段和第十一段中得出均为正确的答案,而选项C与原文第九段内容不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3272607.html
相关试题推荐
CriticsandsupportersoftheUnitedNationshavesometimesseenworldsapart.
CriticsandsupportersoftheUnitedNationshavesometimesseenworldsapart.
Firstitwasmetals,nowitisthecompaniesthatminethem.InMaypricesfor
Firstitwasmetals,nowitisthecompaniesthatminethem.InMaypricesfor
Firstitwasmetals,nowitisthecompaniesthatminethem.InMaypricesfor
Firstitwasmetals,nowitisthecompaniesthatminethem.InMaypricesfor
Eachyear,acoupleofnationalbigbudgetmoviessweartotakeusbysurprise
Itisobviousthatthereisagreatdealofdifferencebetweenbeinginternation
[originaltext]TheUnitedNationsSecretary-GeneralBanKi-moonhaswarnedtha
Itisalongtimeforalargemountofbigcorporationsorinternationalcompa
随机试题
Culturesaredifferentbecausethelocationstheyexistinarediff
Themerefact______mostpeoplebelievenuclearwarswouldbemadnessdoesn’tm
【B1】[br]【B2】A、penaltiesB、costC、expenditureD、expensesA该题考点为动词近义词辨析。这里要表达的意思
(2013年)根据民法理论,下列导致所有权消灭的法律事实中,属于民事法律行为的是
临床上须同时测心率和脉搏的患者是()。A.心动过速 B.心房颤动 C.心动
败毒散的君药是A.人参B.羌活C.川芎D.羌活、独活E.川芎、柴胡
各种运输方式内外部的各个方面的构成和联系,就是( )。 A.运输系统
患儿男,9个月。先天性左侧完全性唇腭裂。因唇裂形成畸形的因素中不包括 A.口轮
早期大肠癌是A.局限于黏膜层及黏膜下层的癌 B.侵及黏膜下层的癌 C.侵及浅
老年人较青年人发病率更高的疝是A.脐疝 B.腹股沟直疝 C.腹股沟斜疝 D
最新回复
(
0
)