首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
游客
2023-12-12
67
管理
问题
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus—the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £ 30—though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1, 286 in every 10, 000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $ 200 or lose $ 100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch. Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] In his experiments, the subjects______Mr. Kahneman’s proof of their errors.
选项
A、can identify with
B、turn a deaf ear to
C、feel aversion to
D、are overjoyed to hear about
答案
B
解析
细节题。由题干中的proof of their errors定位至末段。第二句指出“When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors,the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up,but confused silence,followed by business as usual.”,这里指出卡内曼拿出确凿证据证明实验者的错误时,他们非常困惑地保持了沉默,紧接着,一切又回归原样。可见[B]“置若罔闻”符合文意,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3267775.html
相关试题推荐
Toomanytestswilldoharmtocultivateourindependentthinking.cultivate——cul
RobinsonCrusoeisthemasterpieceof______.A、DanielDefoeB、JonathanSwiftC、Ol
DanielDefoeisafamousA、poetB、novelistC、playwrightD、essayistB丹尼尔·笛福是英国著名小说
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
随机试题
Thispartistotestyourabilitytodopracticalwriting.Youarerequiredtow
ThreeSystemsofMemory1.SensorymemoryInformationheldforlessthan
四环素不宜用于儿童和妊娠妇女是通过什么决定的A.老药的毒理学评价 B.新药疗效
患者,男,67岁。间断咳嗽、咳痰30年,伴喘息5年,加重3天。最可能的诊断是
A.凝胶色谱 B.吸附色谱 C.沉淀法 D.分配色谱 E.pH梯度萃取法
( )是指结算业务发生在两家不同的银行间的清算业务。A.联行 B.联行往来
按照工作特征模型理论,工作的核心特征包括()。A.任务的重要性 B.技能
背景:某非地震地区某小区共有40栋砖混住宅楼工程,分两期组织流水施工,每期20栋
吗啡抑制呼吸的主要原因是A.作用于中脑盖前核 B.能降低呼吸中枢对血液中CO的
某建设工程施工合同约定工程开工,竣工日期分别为2013年3月1日和2014
最新回复
(
0
)