首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
游客
2023-12-12
46
管理
问题
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus—the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £ 30—though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1, 286 in every 10, 000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $ 200 or lose $ 100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch. Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] According to the passage, the human brain can be described as
选项
A、irrational.
B、oblivious.
C、disorderly.
D、capricious.
答案
D
解析
细节题。由the human brain定位至第四段首句“After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty,easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness.”。句中nighty意为“反复无常的”,与capricious“善变的,反复无常的”含义相同,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3267773.html
相关试题推荐
DanielDefoeisafamous______.A、poetB、novelistC、playwrightD、essayistB丹尼尔·笛福
Toomanytestswilldoharmtocultivateourindependentthinking.cultivate——cul
Accordingtothenewsitem,thisyearIraqwouldbantheimmunitytowards[origi
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
Accordingtotheinterviewer,whatattitudedomostyoungpeopleholdtowardske
WartimeAmericandiplomacylargelywasAmericandiplomacytowards______.A、German
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
CriticalThinking&InnovativeWritingI.Heateddiscussionaboutthe(1)_____of
随机试题
现在去那里没有好处,因为那里相当寒冷。(nogood)It’snogoodgoingnow.becauseit’scoldthere.(主要考
PreventionisBetterthanCureForthispart,youareallowed30minutesto
确定工程项目标准体系的()是编制完善的工程项目标准体系的重要环节。A.目标
已知:charstr[10],*p=str;下面C语言语句中正确的是()。
上海证券交易所在《上海证券交易所科创板企业发行上市申报及推荐暂行规定》中指出,根
小儿指纹色鲜红主A.里热证B.外感表证、寒证C.疼痛、惊风D.脾虚、疳积E.血络
功能补益心脾,养血安神的药物是A.何首乌 B.白芍 C.龙眼肉 D.
博弈论在外行人看来只是一大堆数学公式,好在博弈论关心的是日常经济生活问题,所以不
处于企业生命周期中()的企业可能不再适应环境,或者变得行动迟缓,过于行政化,因
男,26岁。周期性上腹痛3年。空腹及夜间加重,进食后缓解。13C尿素呼气试验阳性
最新回复
(
0
)