首页
登录
职称英语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ri
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ri
游客
2023-12-11
33
管理
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economics and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that two unique aspects of Europeans culture were crucial ingredient in Europe’s economic growth.
First, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on Science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style-sEuropeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Second, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their mom vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the World and put it to use--as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" oil them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty; individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining-model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government. [br] In discussing Landes’s work, the author’s tone is ______.
选项
A、enthusiastic,
B、skeptical.
C、reproachful.
D、matter-of-fact.
答案
D
解析
态度题。在对Landes的作品进行介绍时,作者使用了诸如he believes,Landes adds,Landes believes, Landes argues,Landes holds等客观引述的结构,全文论述没有夹带作者自己的观点,末就Landes的观点和作品进行任何评论,因此为客观引述,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3264978.html
相关试题推荐
TheprincipalauthoroftheDeclarationofIndependencewasA、BenjaminFranklin.
______isthefirstAmericanauthortowintheNobelPrize.A、FitzgeraldB、Sincla
TheUnitedNationsGeneralAssemblywillsetupanewagencyto[originaltext]
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUE?[originaltext]Russianauthorities
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECT?[originaltext]Healthauthoritiesinmany
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
WhatdoseveralairlinesblametheEuropeanauthoritiesfor?[br][originaltext
随机试题
______(瘫痪在床多年).helostallhopeofrecovery.Havingbeenlaidupwithparalysis
[originaltext]W:IsthereamancalledBeninyourdepartment?M:I’msorry.I’mn
Baby-NamingTrends[A]Overthelastfiftyyears,Americanparentshaver
典型慢性肾功能不全时的水电解质紊乱是A、代谢性酸中毒、低血钙、高血磷、高血钾
关于外币股权投资基金,表述错误的是()。A.外币股权投资基金既可以在中国境内以
A.香附B.醋香附C.四制香附D.酒香附E.香附炭具有疏肝止痛,并能消积化滞的是
中国临床检验标准委员会推荐尿比密测定的参考方法是( )。A.化学试带法 B.
呋喃唑酮是A.硝基呋喃类抗菌药 B.磺胺类抗菌药 C.异喹啉类抗菌药 D.
基金份额持有人是()。 A.基金投资者B.基金的出资人 C.基金资产
甘松除行气止痛外,又能A.温肾散寒 B.开郁醒脾 C.温肾纳气 D.燥湿化
最新回复
(
0
)