首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-11
40
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] Which of the following statements is TRUE of the human brain?
选项
A、In most cases, System 1 is working.
B、System 2 works to lead to mistakes.
C、System 2 is preferred by rational people.
D、System 2 is more complex than System 1.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由选项中的System 1和System 2定位至第四段。末句指出“System 2 kicks…to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.”,这说明更多的时候,是让受直觉影响的系统一来替我们作决定,[A]符合文意,故为答案。由第四段第三句可知,导致错误的是系统一,非系统二,排除[B];由第四句可知,文章并未说理性之人喜欢系统二,[C]为过度推断,排除;第四段末句只是说系统二更适用于处理复杂问题。该段分别介绍了系统一、系统二的特点,在第五段还具体分析了系统一的优点,并未比较两个系统哪个更复杂,[D]无依据,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262563.html
相关试题推荐
ThenovelGulliver’sTravelsiswrittenbyA、DanielDefoe.B、JonathanSwift.C、Fr
AccordingtoProfessorDanielePiomelli,humansdeveloped______.[br][original
AccordingtoProfessorDanielePiomelli,humansdeveloped______.[originaltext]
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
Get’emThinking!Usingthe"3Rs"ofMediaLiteracyToday,I’ll
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
[originaltext]A:Howdoyouandyourhousematesliketheco-up?I’mthinking
随机试题
Thetargetofthevoucherprogramsis[originaltext]Fiftyyearsago,Milton
在中国大陆,户口(thecertificateofregisteredresidence)是中国公民在一个地方合法上学、就业、获得社会保障和分配
It’shotnowinAfghanistan,where35%ofthepopulationisunder-fed.Buts
离子固体的载流子只是正负离子()
高压B燃气管道的输气压力范围是()。A.0.8MPa<P≤1.6MPa
患者,男,41岁。午后呕吐2次,腹泻5次,经输液治疗后,夜间吐泻未作,天明前左腿
城市规划学术界较多采用比较直观的、简单易行的“图解式分类法”,以()为差别标
根据《气体灭火系统设计规范》,下列关于七氟丙烷气体灭火系统设计要求的说法中,不正
治疗肺痨阴阳俱虚证,应首选的方剂是( )。A.月华丸 B.金匮肾气丸 C.
会计凭证归档保管的主要方法和要求有()。A:会计凭证应定期装订成册,防止散失B
最新回复
(
0
)