首页
登录
职称英语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel ve
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel ve
游客
2023-12-10
54
管理
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him, was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] In the author’s opinion, which of the following is NOT the success we’ve achieved in the effort to fight againt terrorist attack?
选项
A、We have arrested perpetrators and plotters.
B、We have prevented planned attacks.
C、We have combated and eliminated terrorism.
D、We have reduced the power and scope of terrorists.
答案
C
解析
第4段第2句提到已经取得some great successes,接下来的说明中包括抓获恐怖袭击的实施者和策划者(A项),挫败一些有预谋的袭击行动(B项),削弱他们的权力和范围(D项)。只有C项没有提及,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262495.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
TherewereeightJapanesegentlemenhavingafishdinneratBentley’s.They
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
[originaltext]Robinson:Li,IsuggestwedoaquicktourofcentralLondon.As
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelve
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelve
随机试题
请问您可以给我们提供什么最新的消息吗?[br][audioFiles]2018m8x/audio_etrktsj_201807_031[/audioFil
孙思邈不仅认真学习,而且在碰到疑难病无法治疗时,也从不畏缩,而是勤于思考,深入研
放置宫内节育器的适应证是A.已婚育龄妇女,愿意选用而无禁忌证者 B.生殖器官炎
患者男,45岁,因车祸造成多处外伤,在伤口创面出现脓性分泌物,经培养,在血平板上
5b66cA.d77r8 B.8p99t C.6ebbf D.s74qq
( )最主要的作用是订座,还可以打票、建立常客信息、订旅馆等。 A.PNR
设置和登记账簿同会计凭证的填制和审核紧密相关,是会计核算工作的一个重要环节()
女性,45岁。被鱼刺刺伤右手示指尖2天,右手示指尖针刺样痛半天就诊。査体体温3
在单位时间内通过交通线路某一地点的客流量是()。A:客流 B:断面客流量 C
关于心动周期的叙述,正确的是A.心室收缩期比心室舒张期长 B.房、室有共同舒张
最新回复
(
0
)