首页
登录
职称英语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel ve
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel ve
游客
2023-12-10
33
管理
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him, was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] The terrorist attack in London conveys to us the message that
选项
A、people in London did not feel painful.
B、we must be on the alert for terrorism.
C、we should stay at home to avoid terrorism.
D、the effort at anti-terrorism was in vain.
答案
B
解析
第3段最后一句提到,在反对蓄意以无辜平民为袭击目标的敌人时,必须保持警醒。文中的remain vigilant与B项中的be on the alert同义,故B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3262494.html
相关试题推荐
HenryIIdividedthecountryinto______circuitsandappointedtravelingjudgest
MobyDickisthemostimportantworkbyA、JackLondon.B、HermanMelville.C、Sincl
ThecapitalofScotlandisA、Glasgow.B、Edinburgh.C、Manchester.D、London.BGlasg
ThecapitalofWalesisA、Cardiff.B、Edinburgh.C、Manchester.D、London.ACardiff(
ThenewsagencyReuterswasfoundedinA、Birmingham.B、London.C、Manchester.D、Li
Havinglongcoastlines,Canadahasbecometheworld’slargestexporterofA、pork.
Thephenomenonthatwordshavingdifferentmeaningshavethesameformiscalled
Joyinlivingcomesfromhavingfineemotions,trustingthem,givingthemth
Peopletravelinglongdistancesfrequentlyhavetodecideif(1)______they
Peopletravelinglongdistancesfrequentlyhavetodecideif(1)______they
随机试题
Passage1[br][originaltext]尊敬的校长,老师们、同学们:我早已盼望在剑桥同老师、同学们见面,互相交流。现在正是金融危机的严
Areorganicallygrownfoodsthebestfoodchoices?Theadvantagesclaime
“听得道一声去也,松了金钏;遥望见十里长亭,减了玉肌”所用的修辞手法是( )
档案统计中所用的相对数是从两个有联系的指标对比中得出的一种指标,一般以()形
下列关于小细胞肺癌的叙述中错误的是A.与吸烟密切相关 B.恶性程度高 C.对
微量生化反应系统的原理,不正确的是A:根据细菌不同生物学性状及代谢产物的差异B
蓄电池室的温度宜保持在(5~30)℃,最高不应超过35℃,并应通风良好
在饭店组织中,管理者的授权是( )。A.背景权 B.职位权力 C.专长权
(2016年真题)下列房地产成本费用中,应计入竣工房屋价值的有()。A.房屋基
喷射性呕吐见于A.肠梗阻 B.颅内高压 C.急性腹膜炎 D.消化性溃疡
最新回复
(
0
)