首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] An interview with Helena Norberg-Hodge, about her work in a pr
[originaltext] An interview with Helena Norberg-Hodge, about her work in a pr
游客
2023-12-09
40
管理
问题
An interview with Helena Norberg-Hodge, about her work in a pristine, ancient Himalayan culture as it faced the siren song of western-style development. Share International US editor Monte Leach spoke with Norberg-Hodge on her recent visit to the San Francisco Bay Area.
Share International: How did you first get involved with helping to preserve the Ladakhi culture?
Helena Norberg-Hodge: I trekked into remote valleys and spoke to Ladakhi people everywhere. I saw quite a remarkable self-reliant wealth and above all an amazing self-esteem of people who were models of what it means to feel completely secure in their own identity and place. They seemed to be the most open, happy and humble people. And they told me they had never known hunger. They had a standard of living much higher than I would have expected, none of it from so-called progress.
SI: How did their way of life begin to be undermined?
HNH: The Indian Government had a territorial dispute with the Chinese, and decided to develop this area as a way of ensuring that it became a closer part of India. Their approach to development was based on a Western model which had nothing to do with local knowledge and resources. This included pushing chemical fertilizers and pesticides, including DDT and other outlawed pesticides. It meant subsidizing white rice and white sugar from the outside. These subsidies for imported food were destroying local food production, and creating a total dependence on imports. It was making the region very vulnerable. Subsidized fossil fuels like kerosene and coal being brought in to heat houses also led to subsidized transport. It meant that roads the government was building were actually destroying the local economy.
Tourism also became part of the Indian Government’s plan to develop the area. Nearly every foreigner who came there was just amazed by how peaceful, happy and beautiful the place and people were. The foreigners would say: "Oh, what a paradise. What a pity it has to be destroyed." When I heard this for something like the 100th time, something within me snapped. I was closely involved with the local people, and I knew not a single one of them thought of this as destruction. Not a single local person ever said: "What a pity we have to be destroyed." I realized the foreigners had seen that in the rest of the world this type of economic growth could be very destructive. I also realized the local people knew nothing about it. Around that time I read a book called Small is Beautiful. It gave me the conviction that things could be done differently and meeting the outside world didn’t have to mean destruction.
I started talking to the local people about what development had meant in other parts of the world. I realized they were getting a completely wrong view of what life was like in the West. They were saying: "My God, you must be incredibly wealthy." They were getting an impression that we never need to work, that we have infinite wealth and leisure. It is not that they were unintelligent, but they had limited information about this other world.
That led me to realize that I could do work which would provide more accurate information. My goal was not to tell the Ladakhis what to do, not even to tell them that they should stay exactly the way they were, but to provide as much information as possible on what life is really like in the West. That included information on our problems of pollution, unemployment, and poverty, and that a lot of the poverty in the so-called Third World was due to our wealth in the developed world. I also wanted to show that many Westerners who ended up a part of this system were struggling in their own country to find a more environmentally and socially equitable way of living. I gave examples that some people were using solar energy and growing food organically, and implementing a range of more sustainable and equitable alternatives.
SI: What kind of response did you get from the Ladakhis?
HNH: On the whole the information was received with great interest and appreciation. The end result was that the message showed them they need not feel ashamed about who they were, or think they were backward or primitive. There were also modernized young men who for a while thought this approach would hold them back, but they have on the whole now changed. I think the support now for this work is tremendous, and growing all the time in Ladakh.
选项
A、Open.
B、Happy.
C、Self-protected
D、Humble.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3256920.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]AseniorAmericandefenseofficialsaysthePentagonmayrepla
[originaltext](7)TheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncilhasapprovedaresolu
MrFischerbelievesthat______[br][originaltext]Question:MrFischer,congra
MrFischerbelievesthat______[br][originaltext]Question:MrFischer,congra
MrFischerbelievesthat______[originaltext]Question:MrFischer,congratulati
[originaltext]FormerDemocraticvicepresidentialcandidateJohnEdwardssai
[originaltext]FormerDemocraticvicepresidentialcandidateJohnEdwardssai
WhatisthemoststrikingfeatureofParker’sbookstotheinterviewer?[br][o
WhatisthemoststrikingfeatureofParker’sbookstotheinterviewer?[br][o
[originaltext]GeorgeW.BushonFridaypresentedtoCongressaletterformal
随机试题
Morethan2,300universitiesinover100countrieshaveintroducedChinesec
[originaltext]TheUKgovernmentisproposingagraduatetaxforstudentsin
具体问题具体分析所依据的辩证法原理是()。 A.矛盾的同一性 B.矛盾的斗争
双向扩散试验中,若抗体含量较大,但抗原的分子量比抗体大,则沉淀线应为A.靠近抗原
以下属于应收账款实质性审查程序的有()。A.取得或编制应收账款账龄分析表 B.
已知某场地地层条件及孔隙比e随压力变化拟合函数如下表,②层以下为不可压缩层,地下
2004-124.周身浮肿,小便不利可见于 A.肾阳虚B.寒湿困脾C.
股票型基金以股票为主要投资对象,股票投资比重不得低于60%。
患儿5岁,便血,新鲜,量不多,位于大便外面,考虑哪种疾病可能性最大A.痢疾 B
弥漫性硬化性肾小球肾炎的肾脏改变为A、大瘢痕性固缩肾 B、大白肾 C、蚤咬肾
最新回复
(
0
)