首页
登录
职称英语
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
游客
2023-12-08
27
管理
问题
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in which those who consume its product do not purchase it; those who produce it do not sell it, and those who finance it do not control it. That apt description, made in the 1970s, has been undermined since then by the emergence of the first for-profit universities in the United States. Controlled by entrepreneurs, these schools which number about 700 and counting sell a practical education to career-minded students and make a good buck doing it. They are now expanding abroad, creating the first multinational corporations in a sector long suspicious of balance sheets.
The companies are lured by a booming market in which capitalist competition is still scarce. The number of university students is expected to double in the next 25 years to 170 million worldwide. Demand greatly exceeds supply, because the 1990s saw massive global investment in primary and secondary schools, but not in universities. The number of children enrolled in primary or secondary schools rose by 18 percent around the world—more than twice the rate of increase in any previous decade. Now these kids are often graduating from high school to find no openings in national universities, which nevertheless don’t welcome for-profit competition. The Brazilian university teachers’ union warned that foreign corporations would turn higher education into "a diploma industry". Critics raised the specter of declining quality and a loss of Brazil’s "sovereign control" over education.
For-profit universities met with similar suspicion when they first opened in the United States. By the 1980s they were regularly accused of offering substandard education and had to fight for acceptance and respect. Lately, they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties, just a shortcut to a better career. For-profit colleges now attract 8 percent of four-year students in the United States, up from 3 percent a decade ago. By cutting out frills, including sports teams, student centers and summer vacation, these schools can operate with profit margins of 20 to 30 percent.
In some countries, the American companies operate as they do at home. Apollo found an easy fit in Brazil, where few universities have dorms, students often take off time between high school and college, and there’s no summer vacation—just two breaks in July and December. In other Latin countries, Sylvan has taken a different approach, buying traditional residential colleges like the Universidad del Valle de Mexico (UVM). It has boosted enrollment by adding and heavily advertising courses in career-track fields like business and engineering, and adding no-frills satellite campuses. Sensitive to the potential hostility against foreign buyers, Sylvan keeps original school names, adding its own brand, Sylvan International Universities, to publicity materials, and keeps tuition in line with local private schools.
Most of the schools that Sylvan has purchased were managed by for-profits to begin with, including the prestigious Les Roches Hotel Management School in Switzerland. But in general, Says Urdan, Sylvan’s targets "have not been run with world-class business practices. They’re not distressed, but there’s an opportunity for them to be better managed." When Sylvan paid $ 50 million for a controlling stake in UVM two years ago, the school had revenues of about $ 80 million and an enrollment of 32,000. The success of the for-profits is nothing to be afraid of, says World Bank education expert Jamil Salmi: "I don’t think they will replace traditional universities, but they can push some more traditional providers to be more innovative and more attentive to the needs of the labor market."
Some students at Sylvan schools in Latin America welcome the foreign invasion. At the Universidad de las Americas in Santiago, Daniels Villagrán says friends tease her for studying at "Yankeeland," but she figures Sylvan connections "will give me an edge when I go out to look for a job. "The emphasis on independent thought is what separates UVM from other institutions in Mexico. And, for better or worse, more American schools are on the way. [br] There is a booming market for for-profit universities because
选项
A、there was less global investment in national universities in the past.
B、there are fewer universities than primary or secondary schools.
C、for-profit universities can offer better education to their students.
D、the competition for top national universities is getting fiercer and fiercer.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由题干中的a booming market定位趸第二段。第三句指出原因:Demand greatly exceeds supply,because the 1990s saw massive global investment in primary and secondary schools,but not in universities.A符合文意,故为答案。虽然B符合文意,但不是市场繁荣的原因,排除。C和 D均未提及,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3256131.html
相关试题推荐
EmilyDickinson,thegreatestAmerican______,wrotemorethanathousandverses
Theprivatesatelliteindustrysprangupinthemid-1960’storelaynotonlytel
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Theword"freedom"formanyblackAmericansisinextricablylinkedwiththe
Americansfinditdifficulttoengageinanyactivityforpurepleasure.We
Americansfinditdifficulttoengageinanyactivityforpurepleasure.We
随机试题
建筑劳务企业岗位证书的主要种类有()。A.继续教育合格证书 B.管理人员岗位
水下混凝土灌注时,首灌混凝土量应使导管一次埋入混凝土面1m以上。
下列关于排水管道的设计充满度的选择,哪项是正确的?( )A.雨水管道采用非满流
香港土地批租授予一般用地者( )的权利。A.地上权 B.永业权 C.物业权
下列哪一项不是肠杆菌科的共同特性()A.革兰阴性杆菌B.大多有菌毛C.多数有鞭
以下关于胆汁排泄的表述错误的是A.胆汁排泄只排泄原型药物 B.是仅次于肾排泄的
与一般代理关系的确立相同,船舶代理关系的确立也需要经过作为被代理人的船公司的授权
2014年,该市民俗旅游业户均收入约:A.11万元 B.12万元 C.
在道-琼斯指数中,公用事业类股票取自()家公用事业公司。 A.6B.10
下列网络中的参数如图所示,用近似计算法计算得到的各元件标幺值为下列哪项数值?(
最新回复
(
0
)