首页
登录
职称英语
According to the interview, controversy over the book "A Million Little Pieces"
According to the interview, controversy over the book "A Million Little Pieces"
游客
2023-12-07
80
管理
问题
According to the interview, controversy over the book "A Million Little Pieces" lies in its [br]
W: Tonight, exclusive, the controversial book everyone is talking about, "A Million Little Pieces." The biggest non-fiction seller of last year. But is it some kind of fraud? Now, author James Frey’s first interview on the sensational claims against his memoir of addiction and rehabilitation. He’s here for the hour. Welcome, James.
M: Thanks.
W: What’s your side, James?
M: My side is I wrote a memoir. I never expected the book to come under the type of scrutiny that it has. A memoir literally means my story. A memoir is a subjective retelling of events.
W: But it is supposed to be factual events. The memoir is a form of biography.
M: Yes. Memoir is within the genre of non-fiction. I don’t think it’s necessarily appropriate to say I’ve cheated anyone. The book is 432 pages long. The total page count of disputed events is 18, which is less than five percent of the total book. You know, that falls comfortably within the realm of what’s appropriate for a memoir.
W: James, with the kind of incredible life you’ve had, why embellish anything?
M: I mean, I’ve acknowledged that there were embellishments in the book, that I’ve changed tilings, that in certain cases things were toned up, in certain cases things were toned down, that names were changed, that identifying characteristics were changed. There’s a great debate about memoir and about what should be most properly served, the story or some form of journalistic truth. Memoirs don’t generally come under the type of scrutiny that mine has.
W: People reading a memoir expect it to be a true story, whether it’s Alan Alda doing a memoir of his life or James Frey doing a memoir of his, that the facts written down as they happened or their perception of their happening.
M: It’s an individual’s perception of what happened in their own life. This is my recollection of my life. A lot of the events I was writing about took place between 15 and 25 years ago. A lot of the events took place while I was under the influence of drugs and alcohol. I still stand by my book. I still stand by the fact that it’s my story. It’s a truthful retelling of the story.
W: Are you surprised at the furor?
M: I am surprised. I’ve been surprised over and over again throughout this whole process. I’ve been surprised by the success of the book. I’ve been surprised by the reaction to the book. I’ve been surprised by the furor related to the book, especially considering I acknowledged that I had changed things.
W: You did at the beginning?
M: I have at various points all along the course of the publication and promotion of the book.
W: Did you tell Oprah that?
M: I don’t remember specifically what I told Oprah, I certainly told her producers that, you know, things were altered in the book, that I made changes to the book, that sometimes those changes were made in order to protect the identities of specific individuals. Sometimes things were changed because they were too ridiculous. Sometimes things were changed for simple reasons of efficiency. There’s one example of a change made where I talk about a gash I had, a cut that I received. In the book, I say I cut my cheek. In reality, what happened is when I fell down, my lower teeth tore up my lip and penetrated it in two separate places. I received the stitches I talked about receiving, but in the book I say, I cut my cheek.
W: Why?
M: Because it’s a lot easier than saying over and over again that I cut the area between my lower lip and my chin. You know, I believe that the essential truth of the event remains, there it’s a large cut on my face.
W: Are you saying that essential truth of this book, you stand by 100 percent?
M: Absolutely. The book is about drug and alcohol addiction.
W: Of which you were addicted to both?
M: Yes. Nobody’s disputing that I was an addict or alcoholic. Nobody was disputing that I spent a significant period of time in a treatment center. Five pages at the beginning of the book and five pages at the end of the book are the only parts that don’t take place in a treatment center.
W: well, take a break. We’ll be right back.
选项
A、He acknowledged there were deceptions in the book.
B、He admitted he had altered some things in the book.
C、He had told Oprah’s producer the changes in the book.
D、He had never expected the reaction to the book.
答案
A
解析
访谈中男士一直坚持自己没有欺骗读者,故A项中说他承认deceptions“欺骗”显然不对,为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3253667.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext](I--Interviewer;K--MilesKimball)I:Foralmostayear,eco
Accordingtothetalk,compulsivegamblingandalcoholicaddictionsharesimilar
Accordingtothetalk,compulsivegamblingandalcoholicaddictionsharesimilar
Accordingtothetalk,compulsivegamblingandalcoholicaddictionsharesimilar
Accordingtothetalk,compulsivegamblingandalcoholicaddictionsharesimilar
Accordingtosomeexpertsandemployers,manyyoungemployeeswithasingle-
AccordingtotheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncil,whatshouldSouthSudando?[b
AccordingtotheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncil,whatshouldSouthSudando?[o
[originaltext]InterviewwithPAULRAY:AD:HowdidyoudiscovertheCulturalCr
OneofNathanielHawthorne’smasterpiecesisA、TheScarletLetter.B、TheFallof
随机试题
ParkingProblem;Forbiddenin【D1】______percentofstreetsReason:Buildingapart
Thepassageisabout______[originaltext]Manysubstancesthatcomeintocont
SetYourBody’sTimeClockOurBodyOperatesLikeaClock[A
Faces,likefingerprints,areunique.Didyoueverwonderhowitispossible
下列关于肺循环的说法,正确的有()。A.肺动脉可扩张性高,对血流阻力小 B
1867年,出售阿拉斯加给美国的是()A.俄国 B.西班牙 C.英国 D
赵某乘坐长途大巴,看到李某熟睡,脚下的新铝锅(价值20元)滚到自己脚下,心想:“
下列属于多靶点蛋白激酶抑制剂类抗肿瘤药物是A.甲磺酸伊马替尼 B.吉非替尼
男,28岁。近3日晨起发现口角有血迹,牙龈疼痛,口气明显。检查:上前牙龈乳头尖端
男性,56岁,间歇性全程无痛性肉眼血尿3月。IVP:肾脏、输尿管未见异常,膀胱右
最新回复
(
0
)