首页
登录
职称英语
Give the Senate some credit: in shaping the current immigration-reform bill,
Give the Senate some credit: in shaping the current immigration-reform bill,
游客
2023-12-07
43
管理
问题
Give the Senate some credit: in shaping the current immigration-reform bill, it has come up with one idea that almost everybody hates. That’s the plan to create a new class of "guest workers"—immigrants who would be allowed to work in the U.S. for three two-year stretches, at most, provided that they return home for a year after each visit. Conservatives dislike the plan because they believe that the guest workers won’t return home after their visas expire. Liberals dislike it because they believe the program will depress American wages and trap guest workers in a state of serfdom. The only vocal supporters of the provision are businesses that rely heavily on immigrant labor, and they’re presumably just looking out for themselves.
History appears to give credence to the plan’s opponents. Think about Germany’s Gastarbeiter problem. Beginning in the early nineteen-sixties, Germany admitted immigrants from Turkey on short-term work visas. Many of these workers, instead of returning home, put down permanent roots, despite having no obvious way of becoming citizens. They were neither deported nor assimilated, and today they’re a sizable minority in many cities and, in some sense, a society unto themselves.
In the U.S., the guest-worker experience has often been one of abuse and mistreatment, most notably during the infamous bracero program. It was started during the Second World War as a way of bringing in a small number of experienced farmworkers to harvest crops in California. But farm owners quickly came to rely on imported labor, and in time more than four hundred thousand braceros a year were crossing the border, only to end up being used as strikebreakers, forced to live in grim migrant camps, and paid less than they’d been promised.
Given this record, and the broader concerns about the effects of illegal immigration, the hostility to the new plan is understandable. It’s also misguided. However imperfect, the guest-worker program is better than any politically viable alternative. Opponents of immigration sometimes imply that adding workers to a workforce automatically brings wages down. But immigrants tend to work in different industries than native workers, and have different skills, and so they often end up complementing native workers, rather than competing with them. That can make native workers more productive and therefore better off. According to a recent study, between 1990 and 2004 immigration actually boosted the wages of most American workers. And if by increasing the number of legal guest workers we reduced the number of undocumented workers, the economy would benefit even more.
Guest workers are also, paradoxically, less likely than illegal immigrants to become permanent residents. Mexican workers, contrary to popular belief, do not, generally, intend to live their entire lives in the U.S. Instead, as the sociologists Douglas Massey and Jorge Durand concluded after a comprehensive study of immigrant attitudes and behavior, most want to work for short periods to generate an alternative source of household income or to buy a house in Mexico.
The new guest-worker plan is not a reprise of the bracero program. Guest workers would no longer be tied to a single employer—within certain limits, they’d be able to change jobs if they wanted—and would be guaranteed all the protections that the law extends to native workers, including the freedom to join a union. These protections would not necessarily insure fair treatment, especially given the Bush Administration’s poor record of enforcing labor laws. But guest workers would have more by James Surowiecki rights than illegal workers, and be better treated. They’d also be paid better—better than they would as illegals, and far better than if they had to stay at home.
In fact, whatever benefits the guest-worker program brought to the U. S. economy or to particular businesses, the biggest winners would be the workers themselves. When a good made by a foreign worker enters this country, the worker gets only a tiny slice of what we pay. But when the worker himself comes into this country his earnings can rise by a factor of ten or more. But the program’s costs to American workers are negligible, the gains for the guest workers are enormous, and the U.S. economy will benefit. This is that rare option which is both sensible and politically possible. Congress should take it. [br] According to the passage, guest workers in the U.S.
选项
A、are immigrants working for short time.
B、are opposed by both Parties and all classes.
C、are believed to leave when their visas expire.
D、are well paid from farm owners.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由题干定位至首段第二句。该句清楚地解释了这个计划的内容,即容许外国人来美国进行最多三次、每次最多两年的短期务工,条件是每个两年期之间要回国居住一年,因此[A]正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3251595.html
相关试题推荐
WhatisthecurrentsupportingrateofBritishpeoplefortheupcoming2012Lond
WhatisthecurrentsupportingrateofBritishpeoplefortheupcoming2012Lond
Accordingtothenews,whatmakesthiscreditcarddifferentfromconventionalo
Thenewsismainlyabout[originaltext]MembersoftheU.S.SenateandHouse
AnEnglishnewspaperiscurrentlyrunningadiscussiononwhetheryoungpeopl
Currently,eachcitizencanconfirmothers’personalinformationbypayingf
WhydoesStandardandPoor’slowerFrance’screditrating?[br][originaltext]
WhydoesStandardandPoor’slowerFrance’screditrating?[originaltext]Sta
GivetheSenatesomecredit:inshapingthecurrentimmigration-reformbill,
GivetheSenatesomecredit:inshapingthecurrentimmigration-reformbill,
随机试题
Howmuchphysicalactivityshouldteenag
下列哪种成分是C3转化酶()A.C234 B.C567 C. D.
固定义齿修复中,若前牙缺隙小于对侧同名牙,可以通过以下措施改善美观,除外A.加大
患者,女性,60岁。因右乳癌行乳癌改良根治术。术后病理示肿块直径3cm,右腋下淋
下列有关国家审计管辖范围的表述,正确的有:A:审计署可以授权地方审计机关对所有中
下列物流要素中,()的目的是克服生产加工和用户对商品使用要求之间的差异,更有效
关于竣工验收,下列说法错误的是()。A、监理人审查后认为尚不具备竣工验收条件的,
下列关于涉税专业服务业务承接程序的说法,正确的有()。A.对于执业过程中知悉的
健康教育的内容包括A.疾病防治的健康教育 B.营养和环境保护的健康教育 C.
男,68岁。半年来每天排便4~5次,便中带血及黏液。突发腹胀、停止排气排便2天。
最新回复
(
0
)