首页
登录
职称英语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normal
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normal
游客
2023-12-06
75
管理
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes. [br] Which of the following statements is INCORRECT of the experiment?
选项
A、The subject entered a hypnotic state.
B、Similar experiments had been done before.
C、It found out something that is unknown to all.
D、Trolleyology is a technique to analyze utilitarianism.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3248354.html
相关试题推荐
Animationmeansmakingthingswhicharelifelesscomeliveandmove.Sincee
Animationmeansmakingthingswhicharelifelesscomeliveandmove.Sincee
Animationmeansmakingthingswhicharelifelesscomeliveandmove.Sincee
Animationmeansmakingthingswhicharelifelesscomeliveandmove.Sincee
Thatlanguagecanbeusedtorefertothingsthatarenotpresentintimeorspa
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
随机试题
WhatisMs.Parson’scurrentposition?[originaltext]Intoday’sbusinessnew
Accordingtothepassage,thetotalsupplyoffoodinAmericaeveryyearreaches
Livinginacityhasbothadvantagesanddisadvantages.Ontheplusside,it
[originaltext]Ifyouweretovisiteducation,asanalien,andsay"What’s
1968年世界医学会规定了医生确定死亡的道德责任和器官移植的道德原则是(
鼻咽癌颅内转移的最常见途径是A.圆孔 B.棘孔 C.破裂孔 D.颈动脉孔
共用题干 FoodandCancerMedicalexpertshav
吴洪斌今年14岁,自小因为脑瘫造成残疾,走路略有不便,受到周围人的嘲笑。面对这样
大户报告制度是指当交易所会员或客户某品种某合约持仓达到交易所规定的持仓报告标准时
甲化妆品公司为增值税一般纳税人,主要从事各类化妆的生产、销售和加工业务。201
最新回复
(
0
)