首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2023-12-05
24
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus — the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists — is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30 — though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly — though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, i$ slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making (fight or flight?), a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy. But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] What does Kahneman, the author of the book, share in common with Copernicus and Darwin?
选项
A、They try to overrule a deep-rooted concept.
B、They undergo research to come to conclusion.
C、They prove natural and social sciences are related.
D、They explain complex theories in a simple way.
答案
A
解析
推理判断题。文章最后一段提到哥白尼挑战了地球是宇宙中心的理论,达尔文挑战了人为中心的世界观,而本书作者试图推翻理性人类的观点,所以他们之间的共同之处在于他们都在试图推翻一些根深蒂固的观点,所以[A]是答案。哥白尼和达尔文研究的属于自然科学范畴,而卡尼曼研究的是人类本身,属于人文科学范畴,他们并没能证明社会和自然科学的关联性,所以[C]错误。虽然最后一段提到本书的目标读者是非专业人士,但不能推断他们都用简单的方法解释了复杂理论,[D]错误。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3247901.html
相关试题推荐
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
DanielDefoedescribes______asatypicalEnglishMiddle-classmanoftheeightee
______isuniversallyconsideredasDanielDefoe’smasterpiece.A、TheRivalsB、Ro
Gulliver’sTravelswaswrittenbyA、DanielDefoe.B、CharlesDickens.C、JonathanS
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
DanielDefoedescribes______asatypicalEnglishMiddle-classmanoftheeightee
MilityHopson’sattitudetowardslendingmoneytofamilyis______.[br][origin
随机试题
EatingDisordersA)Eatingdisordershavebeenmostc
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpress
下列要素中,不能作为绩效评估中能力评估的评价指标的是()。A.专业及相关知
某城市社区通过问卷调查和体检发现辖区常住人口中:①18岁以上成人高血压患病率28
下列药物中,与海藻相反的药物是A.藜芦 B.昆布 C.大枣 D.甘草 E
套管油位异常时,应利用()检测油位,向值班调控人员申请停运处理
男性,46岁。右上腹阵发性绞痛1天。查体:体温39.5°C,血压90/50mmH
用尖牙判断上下颌牙列的近远中相对关系的标志是A:上颌尖牙的远中牙尖嵴、下颌尖牙的
(2020年真题)下列建筑结构体系中,侧向刚度最大的是( )。A.筒体 B.剪
仲裁过程中,如当事人双方达成了调解协议,仲裁庭的做法,正确的有()。A.制作调
最新回复
(
0
)