首页
登录
职称英语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normal
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normal
游客
2023-12-05
6
管理
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes. [br] The best title for the passage is
选项
A、Utilitarianism as Moral Philosophy.
B、Utilitarians Are Not Nice People.
C、Utilitarian A Good Man?
D、Utilitarianism and Morality.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3246670.html
相关试题推荐
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
First,whilelanguageprovidesameansofsayinganddoingthings,teaching
Manythingsmakepeoplethinkartistsareweirdandtheweirdestmaybethi
Manythingsmakepeoplethinkartistsareweirdandtheweirdestmaybethi
Manythingsmakepeoplethinkartistsareweirdandtheweirdestmaybethi
Manythingsmakepeoplethinkartistsareweirdandtheweirdestmaybethi
Manythingsmakepeoplethinkartistsareweirdandtheweirdestmaybethi
随机试题
高山族世代居住在中国的台湾省,人口约为40万。TheGaoshanpeople,about400thousandintotal,haveliv
A.超声检查 B.选择性肝动脉造影检查 C.磁共振成像 D.肝穿刺针吸细胞
患者女,48岁。因午后燥热、心悸等症状就诊。入院后诊断为骨质疏松症,采取激素替代
肝素的抗凝机制是A.促进内皮细胞释放血栓调节蛋白 B.增强血栓调节蛋白与凝血酶
下列属于国管公积金贷款流程的有()。A.签署买卖合同 B.抵押 C.面签
在教育思想史上第一次提出教育具有服务二F社会与服务于个人闲暇生活的思想家是( )
水泥土搅拌法用水泥作加固料时,下列()是正确的。 A.对含有多水高岭石的软土加
2000-119.羌活胜湿汤可治疗 A.头痛B.眩晕C.两者均可D.两者
胆碱酯酶抑制药不用于下述哪种病症?( )A.青光眼 B.A-V传导阻滞 C
对可能导致重大质量与安全事故后果的险情,项目法人和施工等知情单位必要时()上报
最新回复
(
0
)