首页
登录
职称英语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
游客
2023-12-04
55
管理
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through die application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate(灵长目动物). Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis(框架)on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters(支持)the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern" , a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary(初步的)form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate: the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master: a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy—and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions: King, not so much. [br] The author find Barbara King’s book______.
选项
A、persuasive
B、surprising
C、suspicious
D、unconvincing
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干中的Barbara King’s book定位至第九、十段。第九段最后一句提到,BarbaraKing的书主要是一系列轶事;此外,第十段最后一句作者明确指出他认为大多数读者会承认这本书从开始论述的就是一个既定事实,由此可知,作者认为Barbara King的书缺乏说服力,因此[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3242612.html
相关试题推荐
FrancisBacon’s______isregardedasamilestoneinthehistoryofEnglishprose
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessit
Thestudyofalanguagethroughthecourseofitshistoryiscalled______A、Pers
______marksthebeginningoftheperiodofcapitalisminBritishhistory.A、Magna
随机试题
Lookatthenotebelow.Youwillhearamancallingtocomplain.Messag
ThestrivingofcountriesinCentralEuropetoentertheEuropeanUnionmay
相关人员应对吊篮悬挂机构支撑点处结构的承载能力进行复核确认。()
免疫病理检查几乎所有SLE患者均可出现病变的脏器是A.胰腺 B.心脏 C.肺
患肺结核时,可出现( )。A.咯铁锈色痰 B.咯粉红色泡沫痰 C.唇色、睑
某教师阅读《义务教育语文课程标准(2018年版)》后,写了一段学习体会,下列对语
其本质是协调个人利益与社会健康利益的关系,是世界各国卫生法公认的目标这一卫生法基
( )属于绩效薪酬制。A.佣金制 B.计件薪酬制 C.岗位技能薪酬制 D
目前,个人住房贷款业务中所采用的借款合同基本都是统一的格式文本。()
女性,23岁,主诉双侧后牙咀嚼无力。检查:双侧上下第一磨牙松动Ⅱ度,上切牙松动Ⅰ
最新回复
(
0
)