首页
登录
职称英语
(1) NOT since the era of imperial Rome has the "thumbs-up" sign been such a p
(1) NOT since the era of imperial Rome has the "thumbs-up" sign been such a p
游客
2023-11-28
16
管理
问题
(1) NOT since the era of imperial Rome has the "thumbs-up" sign been such a potent and public symbol of power. A mere 12 years after it was founded, Facebook is a great empire with a vast population, immense wealth, a charismatic leader, and mind-boggling reach and influence. The world’s largest social network has 1.6 billion users, a billion of whom use it every day for an average of over 20 minutes each. In the Western world, Facebook accounts for the largest share of the most popular activity (social networking) on the most widely used computing devices (smartphones); its various apps account for 30% of mobile internet use by Americans. And it is the sixth-most-valuable public company on Earth, worth some $ 325 billion.
(2) Even so, Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s 31-year-old founder and chief executive, has even greater ambitions. He has plans to connect the digitally unconnected in poor countries by beaming internet signals from solar-powered drones, and is making big bets on artificial intelligence (AI), "chatbots (聊天机器人)" and virtual reality (VR). This bid for dominance will bring him into increasing conflict with the other great empires of the technology world, and Google in particular. The ensuing battle will shape the digital future for everyone.
Empires built on data
(3) Facebook has prospered by building compelling services that attract large audiences, whose attention can then be sold to advertisers. The same is true of Google. The two play different roles in their users’ lives: Google has masses of data about the world, whereas Facebook knows about you and your friends; you go to Google to get things done, but turn to Facebook when you have time to kill. Yet their positions of dominance and their strategies are becoming remarkably similar. Unparalleled troves of data make both firms difficult to challenge and immensely profitable, giving them the wealth to make bold bets and to deal with potential competitors by buying them. And both firms crave more users and more data—which, for all the do-gooding rhetoric, explains why they are both so interested in extending internet access in the developing world, using drones or, in Google’s case, giant balloons.
(4) The task is to harness data to offer new services and make money in new ways. Facebook’s bet on AI is a recognition that " machine learning" —in which software learns by crunching data, rather than having to be explicitly programmed—is a big part of the answer. It already uses AI techniques to identify people in photos, for example, and to decide which status updates and ads to show to each user. Facebook is also pushing into AI-powered digital assistants and chatbot programs which interact with users via short messages. Next week it is expected to open up its Messenger service (which can already be used to do things like order an Uber car), to broaden the range of chatbots. And Facebook’s investment in VR—it bought Oculus, the cheerleader of this emerging field, for $ 2 billion in 2014—is a bold guess about where computing and communication will go after the smartphone.
(5) But Facebook faces rivals in all these areas. Google is using AI techniques to improve its internet services and guide self-driving cars, and other industry giants are also investing heavily in AI—though with the deepest pockets and the most data to crunch, Facebook and Google can attract the best researchers and most promising startups. Facebook lags behind Amazon, Apple, Google and Microsoft when it comes to voice-driven personal assistants; when it comes to chatbots, it faces competition from Microsoft and a host of startups eager to prove that bots are the new apps, And its push into VR—which Mr. Zuckerberg sees as a stepping stone to "augmented reality (增强现实)" (AR), where information is superimposed on the real world—pits it against formidable rivals, too. Microsoft has jumped straight to AR with its HoloLens (全息透镜) headset, its most impressive product in years, and Google, already active in VR, has invested in Magic Leap, a little-known AR startup.
(6) The scale of Facebook’s ambition, and the rivalries it faces, reflect a consensus that these technologies will transform how people interact with each other, with data and with their surroundings. AI will help devices and services anticipate your needs (Google’s Inbox app already suggests replies to your e-mails). Conversational interfaces will let you look things up and get things done by chatting to a machine by voice or text. And intelligent services will spread into a plethora of products, such as wearable devices, cars and VR/AR goggles. In a decade’s time computing seems likely to take the form of AR interfaces mediated by AI, using gestures and speech for inputs and the whole world as its display. Information will be painted onto the world around you, making possible new forms of communication, creativity and collaboration.
(7) This is the ambitious vision that Facebook, Google, Microsoft and other technology giants are working towards. But along the way there are certain to be privacy and security concerns. Crunching all that information to provide personalised services looks a lot like surveillance, and will cause a backlash if consumers do not feel they are getting a good deal in return for handing over their personal details (as the advertising industry is discovering to its cost)—or if security is inadequate. Power from the people
(8) There will also be worries about concentration and monopoly, and the danger of closed ecosystems that make it hard for people to switch between services. Facebook’s plan to offer free access to a limited subset of websites was blocked by India’s telecoms regulator, which argued that it was "risky" to allow one company to act as a gatekeeper. And Germany’s competition authority is investigating the way Facebook handles personal data. As its dominance grows, Facebook can expect to face more such cases, as Microsoft and Google did before it.
(9) Striking a balance between becoming ever more intimately entwined in billions of peoples’ lives, making huge profits as a result and avoiding a backlash will be one of the biggest business challenges of the century. Even in ancient Rome, emperors could find that the crowd suddenly turned against them. So applaud Mr. Zuckerberg—and fear for him, too. [br] According to the last paragraph, the author felt______about the future of Facebook.
选项
A、apprehensive
B、confident
C、gloomy
D、optimistic
答案
A
解析
态度题。文章最后一段开头提到脸谱网的现有成就是与数十亿用户的生活更加紧密地交织在一起,从而获得巨额利润,但同时要避免在未来引起反弹。然后以古罗马的皇帝们为例,指出脸谱网可能会像他们一样遭遇民众的突然反对。作者又在最后一句提到为扎克伯格喝彩的同时也为他担心。由此推断作者对脸谱网取得的成就表示赞许,但又对其未来表现出担忧,故[A]为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3227498.html
相关试题推荐
(1)NOTsincetheeraofimperialRomehasthe"thumbs-up"signbeensuchap
(1)NOTsincetheeraofimperialRomehasthe"thumbs-up"signbeensuchap
(1)NOTsincetheeraofimperialRomehasthe"thumbs-up"signbeensuchap
(1)NOTsincetheeraofimperialRomehasthe"thumbs-up"signbeensuchap
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Haveyoufinishedyourhomework?W:No,notyet.Canyouhelp
【S1】[br]【S3】off→away搭配错误。getawaywith表示“摆脱掉”,符合句子的要求。
下面有关插件的描述错误的是A.浏览器缺少插件可能会导致乱码 B.是浏览器另
当归的药理作用不包括A.促进造血B.降血脂C.抗心肌缺血D.保肝利胆E.增强性腺
关于生育保险,下列说法正确的是()。A.企业必须按期缴纳生育保险费 B.
()思维障碍会导致人们缺乏对自我思考结果的认同A.权威性 B.从众型 C.
下列不属于劳动合同的必备条款的是()。A.劳动合同期限 B.工作内容和工作
华胜公司是生产经营手机业务的跨国公司,其组织按照两维结构设计,一维是按照职能专业
(2021年真题)在边际贡献为正的前提下,某产品单位变动成本和单价均降低1元。不
以下不是引起ALl/ARDS的肺内因素的是A、化学因素,如吸入毒气 B、物理因
最新回复
(
0
)