2. 职称英语
  3. (1) As a child, I loved Charlie Chaplin films. I would put on my father’s sho

(1) As a child, I loved Charlie Chaplin films. I would put on my father’s sho

游客2023-11-28  28
问题    (1) As a child, I loved Charlie Chaplin films. I would put on my father’s shoes and wander about with a trampish gait. Luckily, I never boiled and ate the shoes—I would not see Chaplin do that (in The Gold Rush) for a few years yet. I am from the last generation that found it quite normal to watch silent films on television. There was nothing arcane or archaic about it. It was an everyday part of BBC2 programming.
   (2) As I grew older, my love of Laurel and Hardy remained, but Chaplin went out of favour. The received wisdom that he was overly sentimental meant that it became unfashionable to like him. Keaton was the one to revere; he was considered a more serious clown, with a stone face of existential angst and boasting a collaboration with Samuel Beckett.
   (3) Why it might be necessary to make a choice between Keaton and Chaplin I have no idea—there is time enough to celebrate both. But I find a surprising number of people who say: "I never really got Chaplin. " Each time I return to Chaplin, I find it harder to understand how anyone can dismiss him. He wrote, produced, directed, starred in and composed the music for a series of powerful, funny, philosophical and moving films. Even the first cinematic outing of the tramp, Kid Auto Races at Venice, can make me laugh 100 years on, as Chaplin repeatedly gets in the way of the news cameras and racing cars with such brazen cheek.
   (4) Or there is the ludicrous image of Chaplin becoming a wooden hedgehog as he hurls 11 chairs on his back in Behind the Screen, as fresh as any visual comedy being made now.
   (5) Though the bread-roll dance from The Gold Rush has been so often imitated that it may seem to have lost some of its wonder, watch the sequence again and you will see how intricate something of seeming simplicity is. Johnny Depp spoke of having to imitate it in Benny and Joon and said it took days to get everything just right. It is so much more than it at first seems.
   (6) That is what makes Chaplin live on—the depth of thought behind each seemingly simple routine. It is never just falling over with a bang, it is acrobatics with aplomb, it is the grace of the chaos. As his biographer Richard Schickel noted, with Chaplin, all that seems solid melts into something else.
   (7) For those who ask, "But is Chaplin really still funny?" I can promise you that a new generation of children do laugh at Chaplin attempting a tightrope walk while distracted by monkeys in The Circus. There may be many banana-skin routines, but I am pretty sure Chaplin was the first to attempt the banana skin on the tightrope.
   (8) The Rink is my earliest memory of watching Chaplin. Here he is, a waiter, his face showing no servile deference as he works out a bill based on the remnants of food spattered over the diner, the furious and luxuriantly eyebrowed Eric Campbell, before pocketing an unoffered tip. He is lovable, rebellious, coquettish, both worldly and otherworldly. As for the roller-rink routine in that film, I would watch Dancing on Ice if only it were that good.
   (9) Eric Campbell was also the monstrous street-fighting adversary in Easy Street. Unable to floor him, or even move him with fisticuffs, Chaplin eventually overcomes him by pulling his head into the lamp of a street light and gassing him. Woody Allen declared that Easy Street would be funny in a thousand years from now. The potency of the ridiculousness has made it last nearly a century already.
   (10) Neil Brand, a fine pianist who frequently accompanies silent film performances, acknowledges that today’s audiences have to overcome the mores and attitudes of a bygone age, but says that once that is done, we can still empathise with Chaplin as he responds to overwhelming forces.
   (11) City Lights, Chaplin’s most revered film and highest on the American Film Institute’s 100 greatest films list, opens on a scene of accidental rebellion. The grand unveiling of an epic statue is ruined when the drape comes off to reveal the tramp asleep in the arms of the granite god. As the US national anthem plays, the tramp attempts to stand to attention while dangling by the butt of his trousers from the sword of a carved figure.
   (12) There is set piece after set piece and, though my twentysomething self probably sneered at the innocent love story of tramp and blind girl, the fortysomething me is more romantic and easily moved by this tale of a tramp who will do anything for the love of a woman. It also has the best joke with an elephant in any movie I can think of.
   (13) As for The Great Dictator, amid the drama, social commentary and vivid portrayal of the rising oppression of the Jewish people in Germany, there are moments of superb broad comedy. Adenoid Hynkel, a petty, preposterous dictator with delusions of monstrous grandeur, is ripe for having his pretensions punctured.
   (14) The scenes of desperation as he attempts to show that he is a great dictator to rival Napaloni, played with oomph and chutzpah by Jack Oakie, continue to make me laugh. And it contains undoubtedly my favourite choking-on-hot-mustard scene. There are few greater joys than seeing those of high status fall flat on their face.
   (15) And then there is Limelight. The music hall may be long dead, but Limelight still conveys what it is to be a clown, the desperation and fear of losing your audience, what it is to age and rail against age and loss.
   (16) If you want to sample his magnificence with a brief scene, just look at the delicacy with which he plays drunk in Limelight, the subtlety with which he conveys an inebriate attempting to find the keyhole in a door. If that doesn’t work for you, then watch him dressed as a chicken in The Gold Rush or with his face manically covered in soup by a malfunctioning machine that is meant to be a sign of a bright new future in Modern Times.
   (17) There is beauty, humour and humanity to be found here. Chaplin was and is, a cinematic clown genius. [br] Which of the following can NOT be inferred from the first three paragraphs?
选项 A、Watching silent films on TV used to be a normal activity.
B、The author preferred Laurel and Hardy to Chaplin as he grew up.
C、Keaton was more popular than Chaplin for he was considered more serious.
D、Many people found Chaplin’s movies not that interesting.
答案 C
解析 细节题。文章第二段提到，作者长大后便渐渐对卓别林失去了兴趣；还提到基顿曾是位受人尊重的喜剧演员，他被认为是一个很严肃的小丑。但文中并未将基顿与卓别林进行对比，因此[C]中“基顿比卓别林更受欢迎”是错误的，故为答案。第一段第四句提到，“我”是最后一代觉得在电视上看默剧很正常的人，故排除[A]；从第二段第一句可知，随着年龄增长，“我”仍然喜爱劳莱与哈代，但却对卓别林渐渐失去兴趣，因此[B]“作者长大后相较于卓别林更喜欢劳莱与哈代”是正确的，故排除；第三段提到，有很多人说：“我从来没有真正理解过卓别林。”每次回味卓别林的电影，“我”都无法理解为什么人们都不再喜欢他。由此可知，很多人并不理解卓别林，对他的电影不感兴趣，因此[D]是正确的，故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3227181.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)