首页
登录
职称英语
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In
游客
2023-11-28
27
管理
问题
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swept aside by the mechanical loom. Over the past 30 years the digital revolution has displaced many of the mid-skill jobs that underpinned 20th-century middle-class life. Typists, ticket agents, bank tellers and many production-line jobs have been dispensed with, just as the weavers were.
(2)For those who believe that technological progress has made the world a better place, such churn is a natural part of rising prosperity. Although innovation kills some jobs, it creates new and better ones, as a more productive society becomes richer and its wealthier inhabitants demand more goods and services. Optimism remains the right starting-point, but for workers the dislocating effects of technology may make themselves evident faster than its benefits. Even if new jobs and wonderful products emerge, in the short term income gaps will widen, causing huge social dislocation and perhaps even changing politics.
(3)Why be worried? It is partly just a matter of history repeating itself. In the early part of the Industrial Revolution the rewards of increasing productivity went disproportionately to capital: later on, labor reaped most of the benefits. The pattern today is similar. The prosperity unleashed by the digital revolution has gone overwhelmingly to the owners of capital and the highest-skilled workers. Over the past three decades, labor’s share of output has shrunk globally from 64% to 59%. Meanwhile, the share of income going to the top 1% in America has risen from around 9% in the 1970s to 22% today. Unemployment is at alarming levels in much of the rich world, and not just for cyclical reasons. Fifteen years ago, 65% of working-age Americans were in work: since then the proportion has fallen, during good years as well as bad, to the current level of 59%.
(4)Worse, it seems likely that this wave of technological disruption to the job market has only just started. From driverless cars to clever household gadgets, innovations that already exist could destroy swathes of jobs that have hitherto been untouched. The public sector is one obvious target: it has proved singularly resistant to tech-driven reinvention. But the step change in what computers can do will have a powerful effect on middle-class jobs in the private sector too.
(5)Until now the jobs most vulnerable to machines were those that involved routine, repetitive tasks. But thanks to the exponential rise in processing power and the ubiquity of digitised information ("big data"), computers are increasingly able to perform complicated tasks more cheaply and effectively than people. Clever industrial robots can quickly "learn" a set of human actions. Services may be even more vulnerable. Computers can already detect intruders in a closed-circuit camera picture more reliably than a human can. By comparing reams of financial or biometric data, they can often diagnose fraud or illness more accurately than any number of accountants or doctors.
(6)At the same time, the digital revolution is transforming the process of innovation itself. Thanks to off-the-shelf code from the internet and platforms that host services (such as Amazon’s cloud computing), provide distribution (Apple’s app store)and offer marketing (Facebook), the number of digital startups has exploded. Just as computer-games designers invented a product that humanity never knew it needed but now cannot do without, so these firms will no doubt dream up new goods and services to employ millions. But for now they are singularly light on workers. When Instagram, a popular photo-sharing site, was sold to Facebook for about $1 billion in 2012, it had 30 million customers and employed 13 people. Kodak, which filed for bankruptcy a few months earlier, employed 145,000 people in its heyday.
(7)The problem is one of timing as much as anything. Google now employs 46,000 people. But it takes years for new industries to grow, whereas the disruption a startup causes to incumbents is felt sooner. Airbnb may turn homeowners with spare rooms into entrepreneurs, but it poses a direct threat to the lower end of the hotel business—a massive employer.
(8)If this analysis is halfway correct, the social effects will be huge. Many of the jobs most at risk are lower down the ladder (logistics, haulage), whereas the skills that are least vulnerable to automation (creativity, managerial expertise)tend to be higher up, so median wages are likely to remain stagnant for some time and income gaps are likely to widen.
(9)Anger about rising inequality is bound to grow, but politicians will find it hard to address the problem. Shunning progress would be as futile now as the Luddites’ protests against mechanised looms were in the 1810s, because any country that tried to stop would be left behind by competitors eager to embrace new technology. The freedom to raise taxes on the rich to punitive levels will be similarly constrained by the mobility of capital and highly skilled labour.
(10)The main way in which governments can help their people through this dislocation is through education systems. One of the reasons for the improvement in workers’ fortunes in the latter part of the Industrial Revolution was because schools were built to educate them—a dramatic change at the time. Now those schools themselves need to be changed, to foster the creativity that humans will need to set them a-part from computers. There should be less rote-learning and more critical thinking. Technology itself will help, whether through MOOCs (massive open online courses)or even video games that simulate the skills needed for work.
(11)Yet however well people are taught, their abilities will remain unequal, and in a world which is increasingly polarised economically, many will find their job prospects dimmed and wages squeezed. The best way of helping them is not, as many on the left seem to think, to push up minimum wages. Jacking up the floor too far would accelerate the shift from human workers to computers. Better to top up low wages with public money so that anyone who works has a reasonable income, through a bold expansion of the tax credits that countries such as America and Britain use.
(12)Innovation has brought great benefits to humanity. Nobody in their right mind would want to return to the world of handloom weavers. But the benefits of technological progress are unevenly distributed, especially in the early stages of each new wave, and it is up to governments to spread them. In the 19th century it took the threat of revolution to bring about progressive reforms. Today’s governments would do well to start making the changes needed before their people get angry. [br] It can be concluded that the author is towards _____ technological progress.
选项
A、indifferent
B、neutral
C、positive
D、negative
答案
B
解析
最后一段首先肯定了科技进步带来的创新的长处,强调没有人会愿意回到过去,接着又提到科技浪潮的初期会引起分配不均,这又是其弊端,所以作者看到其利弊双方,是中立的,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3225591.html
相关试题推荐
Agoodexerciseprogramhelpsteachpeopletoavoidthehabitsthatmightshorte
Doctorsbaffledbyanunexplainedrashonpeople’searsorcheeksshouldbe
Doctorsbaffledbyanunexplainedrashonpeople’searsorcheeksshouldbe
Doctorsbaffledbyanunexplainedrashonpeople’searsorcheeksshouldbe
Doctorsbaffledbyanunexplainedrashonpeople’searsorcheeksshouldbe
Doctorsbaffledbyanunexplainedrashonpeople’searsorcheeksshouldbe
Forpeoplesufferingfromdepression,theadviceisusuallythesame:seekh
Forpeoplesufferingfromdepression,theadviceisusuallythesame:seekh
Forpeoplesufferingfromdepression,theadviceisusuallythesame:seekh
Forpeoplesufferingfromdepression,theadviceisusuallythesame:seekh
随机试题
GeneticallyModifiedFoods—FeedtheWorld?A)Ifyouwanttospa
Asapopularsayinggoes:"【C1】______"Goodhealthenablesoneto【C2】______an
有时候我们可能会阅读书或杂志中的文章,这些文章可能会促使我们去思考,并将自己的观点与文章中作者的观点进行对比。Sometimeswemayreadan
在中国,数百万计的人通过网络视频直播(livestreaming)与世界分享他们的生活。网络视频直播并不是一个新概念。在中国,各种各样的在线直播应用程
特种作业人员可以先上岗操作,然后再参加培训和考证。()
在Excel中,假设单元格A1、A2、A3和A4的值分别为23、45、36、18
A.二氧化碳、氮气 B.氯化钾、氯化钠 C.苯、甲苯 D.石棉、有机粉尘
排水层的透水性材料可以采用经水泥或沥青处治,或者未经处治的()。A.开级配碎石
血清中含量最高的补体成分是A、Cl B、C2 C、C3 D、C4 E、C
根据《城市建设档案管理规定》,建设单位应当在工程竣工验收后()个月内,向城建档案
最新回复
(
0
)