首页
登录
职称英语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the s
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the s
游客
2023-11-26
10
管理
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels", as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17.5k dead women a year". That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was a good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit, " cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12-1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88, 000 a year, though few patients live that long.) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging", and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life".
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $10, 000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17, 500 dead women (from a right-wing blog) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort, " Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin". Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average, " biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions." But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong". "That some women did live longer on Avastin, " Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy."
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm, " says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public." Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t. [br] The best title of the passage is______.
选项
A、It’s Not About Rationing
B、Why the FDA May Reverse Course on Avastin
C、A Value to a Day of a Person’s Life
D、Avastin, a Controversial Medicine
答案
B
解析
文章最好的标题是:该题为归纳推断题。文章记述了美国食品与药品管理局撤销使用阿瓦斯丁治疗晚期乳腺癌的批准。所以最好的标题是选项B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3221653.html
相关试题推荐
TheFDAmayrescinditsapprovalofAvastin,acolon-cancerdrug.Ifthes
TheFDAmayrescinditsapprovalofAvastin,acolon-cancerdrug.Ifthes
TheFDAmayrescinditsapprovalofAvastin,acolon-cancerdrug.Ifthes
TheFDAmayrescinditsapprovalofAvastin,acolon-cancerdrug.Ifthes
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B5】A、promiseB、convinceC、tellD、informBconvince“劝服,说服”。作为发言者的介绍人,通常
【S1】[br]【S3】L)。空格处位于定冠词the和形容词local之后,因此缺少名词。所填词应能和local搭配,和state形成逻辑和意义递进关系。该
[originaltext]W:Howoftendidyouphonehome?M:Iusedtophonehomeonceaw
《水利工程设计概(估)算编制规定》规定,建设管理费包括( )。A.项目管理费
下列选项中,关于《职业道德规范》中的行为规则的说法不正确的是:A.行为规则为内部
共用题干 患者女性,52岁。10年前患乳腺癌,做过乳房切除和放射治疗,现因背部
属于处方中前记部分的是A.药品名称 B.药品金额 C.医生签名 D.床位号
设立期货公司,应当经国务院期货监督管理机构批准,并在公司登记机关登记注册。()
某旧住宅因没有独立的卫生间所造成的价值损失,属于()。A.物质折旧 B.功能
某工程项目建设期初贷款2000万元,建设期2年,贷款利率为10%,在运营期前5年
最新回复
(
0
)