首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2023-11-09
38
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3171318.html
相关试题推荐
Inadditiontotheirmilitaryrole,thefoalsofthenineteenthcenturypro
Inadditiontotheirmilitaryrole,thefoalsofthenineteenthcenturypro
Inadditiontotheirmilitaryrole,thefoalsofthenineteenthcenturypro
A(n)______lackoffoodbroughthungertotheIraqipeople.A、crucialB、critical
Bytheendofthiscenturyanintelligentrobot______todomostofthehousewor
Afghanistan’sfirstmatchwillbeagainst______.[br][originaltext]Afghan
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
随机试题
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions1—13whicharebasedonReading
Hisheavydrinkingandfondofgamblingmakeshimapoorrolemodel.A、andfactt
[originaltext]M:Hey,Anita!Greattoseeyou!W:Longtimenosee!I’msoglad
Whichquestionwillbeaskediftheapplicantsonceworkedsomewhere?Thequesti
PartⅡReadingComprehension(SkimmingandScanning)Directions:Inthispart,y
ATM有它自己的参考模型,既不同于OSI模型,也不同于TCP/IP模型,它包括(
当配件经理被问到为什么一个关键部件未能及时供应时,他回答说“我四周前就邮寄了订单
某项目建成达产后年固定成本为500000元。单位产品可变成本为80元,单位产品固
治疗风热郁闭,咽喉肿痛,大便秘结者,应首选( )。A.薄荷 B.蝉蜕 C.
某中学开展“小博士”工程,利用课余时间,少则两周,多则三四个月,自己研究探索一个
最新回复
(
0
)