首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2023-10-31
64
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering seems the way ahead. It is this sudden confrontation with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far they are from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant: the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] Which of the following is NOT mentioned about scientists in earlier times?
选项
A、They invented false theories to explain things they didn’t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know all about nature.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。第二段第六句提到,以前我们或假装知道事情的来龙去脉,或对问题置之不理,或者干脆编造故事来填补我们的无知。A,B,D三项符合文意,故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3145912.html
相关试题推荐
Myyoungbrotherhasreallygottenundermyskin.Theunderlinedpartmeans_____
[originaltext]W:Hey,Iheardthatyouarereallyaworldtraveler.Wherehave
[originaltext]W:Hey,Iheardthatyouarereallyaworldtraveler.Wherehave
[originaltext]W:Hey,Iheardthatyouarereallyaworldtraveler.Wherehave
[originaltext]W:Hey,Iheardthatyouarereallyaworldtraveler.Wherehave
[originaltext]M:Ohman.It’sreallynotmyday!W:Havingabadhairday?M:Y
[originaltext]M:Ohman.It’sreallynotmyday!W:Havingabadhairday?M:Y
[originaltext]W:OK,Simon,(1)let’sgooutfordinner.I’mreallyhungry.M:Ye
[originaltext]W:OK,Simon,(1)let’sgooutfordinner.I’mreallyhungry.M:Ye
[audioFiles]2016m12s/audio_ezfj_201610_033[/audioFiles]LoveReallyDoesHur
随机试题
ThefirstsettlersintheU.S.hadto______withunfriendlyIndians,sickness,co
1967年,美国心理学家()发表了《认知心理学》一书,标志着现代认知心理学的正
平面有几处剪力墙为一字形的短肢剪力墙?() A.2处 B.3处
纳税人、扣缴义务人及纳税担保人对税务行政复议范围中()行为不服的,可以向复议机
黄疸类证鉴别
新产品小批鉴定的内容有()。A.成品鉴定 B.工艺文件和装备 C.零件加
()是全体股东的权益,是决定股票投资价值的重要基准。 A.资产净值B.总资
支气管哮喘最主要的病理基础是( )。A.支气管黏膜杯状细胞增生 B.支气管痉
胎头的最大径线是A.双额径 B.枕颏径 C.双顶径 D.枕额径 E.枕下
运行机制是建设工程项目质量控制体系的生命,其中()是来源于公正、公开、公平的竟
最新回复
(
0
)