首页
登录
职称英语
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate
游客
2023-10-29
68
管理
问题
A New Approach to Debate
I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’【T1】______【T1】______
II. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau to teachers
a)Begin with controlled practice: to【T2】______ opinions and arguments【T2】______
b)Caution: no【T3】______topics【T3】______
III. "Discover Debate" Approach
■ Team members: depending on the【T4】______ of students【T4】______
■ The first stage: creating a【T5】______ aid【T5】______
■ The second stage: presenting arguments
■ The third stage: answering the【T6】______ argument【T6】______
a)Pause for the opponents to develop answers or【T7】______【T7】______
b)Evaluate arguments: to look for【T8】______【T8】______
c)Write easily remembered【T9】______【T9】______
■ Ending: ask for audience【T10】______【T10】______ [br] 【T3】
A New Approach to Debate
Teachers of English may hesitate to teach debate because they think it is beyond their students’ language ability, or proficiency. But debate can be a powerful tool. It can help students learn to speak naturally and to listen carefully.
Professor Charles Lebeau teaches English and debate in Japan. He wrote "Discover Debate" with Michael Lubetsky. The book helps English teachers and learners understand how to carry on a simple debate.
The "Discover Debate" approach has three stages: creating a visual aid to communicate an argument, presenting the argument and answering the other team’s argument. Each stage puts increasing demands on language ability. It begins with a pre-debate experience.
When teaching debate to English learners, Mr. Lebeau recommends beginning with "controlled practice." Students work in pairs to practice saying opinions and giving reasons in short conversations. They learn to identify opinions and arguments about everyday topics, such as sports stars, foods, weather and habits.
Teachers may be tempted to give students serious topics, such as "People should stop using nuclear power." However, Mr. Lebeau cautions that English learners may not have the necessary language ability to handle such topics. More serious topics often require special vocabulary and research.
Mr. Lebeau’s classes in Japan are like many in universities: they have 40 to 50 students. He has students form debate teams of three or six, depending on the total number of students. Each team creates a visual aid to show their thinking on the topic. The visual is a house: a roof represents an opinion, pillars are the reasons supporting the opinion and the foundation is the evidence.
In the next stage, students present their argument. They have to do some talking, but not too much.
The third stage is answering the opponents’ argument. Here, debaters need a higher level of language ability. Mr. Lebeau recommends pausing for the opposing team to develop their answers, or refutations. Each team might go to a different area and discuss the weak points in the opposing argument.
Students must first think about the arguments carefully. In "Discover Debate," Michael Lubetsky and Charles Lebeau include a guide to help students evaluate arguments. The evaluation also takes advantage of the visual aid of a house. Students are asked to look for flaws, or problems. They identify things that are either "not true" or "not important."
Students can write easily remembered abbreviations on their opponents’ houses: "NT" for not true, "NAT" for not always true, or "NNT" for not necessarily true. These simple expressions make it easier for students to refute their opponents’ arguments.
Traditional debate includes several cycles of presentation and refutation. For English learners, one cycle of presentation and refutation is usually enough practice. Mr. Lebeau says sometimes he asks the rest of the class to vote on which side won. Asking for audience feedback gives the lesson a good ending. But, he says, additional discussion depends on the situation and the level of the students.
选项
答案
serious
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3141058.html
相关试题推荐
A.instructionsB.hesitationC.faintedD.urgentE.instructF.relief
A.instructionsB.hesitationC.faintedD.urgentE.instructF.relief
Theyshouldadoptamore_____approachandinvestigatealternativeusesforthe
(1)TeachersintheUnitedStatesearnlessrelativetonationalincomethan
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debate
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debate
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debate
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debate
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debate
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debate
随机试题
Although"namingrights"haveproliferatedinAmericanhighereducationfor
【S1】[br]【S10】去掉which或者∧which→in本题考查定语从句用法。引导本句定语从句的先行词在从句中充当状语成分,而which在定语从句中不
[originaltext]Mostofusknowthattheriskofgettingillisreducedwhenwel
教师被人们称为“园丁”、“人类灵魂的工程师”,是受到全社会尊重的一种职业。每年的10月5日为世界教师日。【T1】该节日旨在赞扬和感谢全世界教师为教育事业
程量清单项目,如果因工程变更等原因导致工程量偏差超过()时,合同单价应进行调整
既是改制方案的依据,又是改制资产评估的基础的是( )。A.改制审计报告 B.资
决议和决定都是对重大事项或行动作出决策安排的指挥性下行公文,下列关于二者的说法不
当遇到火灾时,以下逃生方法哪种是错误的()A.在逃生过程中及时关闭防火门、防火卷
由国家主管部门公布的职业病目录所列的职业病称为法定职业病。下列关于职业病诊断条件
女性,30岁,自幼发作性咳嗽、咳痰、喘息,多于春季发作,多自行缓解,10-20岁
最新回复
(
0
)