首页
登录
职称英语
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has c
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has c
游客
2023-10-28
39
管理
问题
(1) Family planning has been a huge success. The global fertility rate has crashed, from 5.1 babies per woman in 1964 to 2.5 today. The average Bangladeshi woman can now expect to have about the same number of children as the average French woman. Only in sub-Saharan Africa are big families still in vogue, and even there they are shrinking. This is welcome. It suggests that women have gained more control over their bodies and that parents no longer reproduce frantically for fear that some of their children will die. Cutting the birth rate also leaves countries with fewer dependants per worker, at least for a time, making them better off.
(2) But this triumph conceals a growing problem. For more and more couples, the greatest source of anguish is that they have fewer children than they want, or none at all. With GlobeScan, a consultancy, The Economist polled 19 countries, asking people how many children they would like and how many they expect to have. In every rich country we surveyed, couples expect to be less fertile than they would like, and many in developing countries suffer the same sorrow. On average, Greeks think the ideal family contains 2.6 children but believe they will end up with 1.7.
(3) Medical infertility is part of the problem, not just in rich countries, where couples put off having children until it is rather late, but also in poor countries, where health care is worse. By one global estimate, at least 48m couples have been trying for a child for the past five years but have not succeeded, up from 42m in 1990. But the main reason for the shortfall, according to our poll, is money. From Brooklyn to Beijing, the cost of housing and education is so high that many young people say they cannot afford as many children as they want.
(4) Malthusians (马尔萨斯人口控制论者) will rejoice. The population is growing fast enough already, they will argue. Besides, can’t infertile couples just adopt children? In fact, population growth today largely reflects longer lives and will eventually go into reverse. It is not clear that there are too many people; and it is callous to ask couples who might want children to forgo that joy simply because some of their neighbours would prefer a less populous planet. And adoption, though admirable, is neither the sole responsibility of the childless nor a perfect substitute for procreation.
(5) The pain of having no or fewer children than you desire is often extreme. It can cause depression and in poor countries can be a social catastrophe. Couples impoverish themselves pursuing ineffective treatments; women who are thought to be barren are divorced, ostracised or worse. Last month a childless Kenyan tailor was charged with attempted murder, having allegedly attacked his wife with a machete.
(6) In wealthy countries, where maternity wards are quiet partly because the young are so economically insecure, governments can help by doing things they should be doing anyway: liberalising labour markets that shut the young out of jobs, relaxing planning rules to make housing cheaper and promoting child-friendly policies in the workplace. Across the world, education is important, both to warn women about how fertility declines with age and, especially in Africa, about preventable infections such as chlamydia and gonorrhoea.
(7) Most important, however, is medical innovation. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) (试管婴儿) has become better over the years but is still horribly expensive. Some couples remortgage their homes in the hope of conceiving. Research into more frugal technology is staggeringly rare, given the demand for it. Would lower, cheaper doses of IVF drugs work as well for some people? No one knows. Will a shoe-box-sized IVF laboratory developed in America work reliably? Trials are only now under way.
(8) More money for research would help, as it generally does. But perhaps not as much as more attention. Governments and aid agencies have turned family planning into a wholly one-sided campaign, dedicated to minimising teenage pregnancies and unwanted births; it has come to mean family restriction. Instead, family planning ought to mean helping people to have as many, or as few, children as they want. [br] What’s the main reason for the worldwide shortfall of birth rate?
选项
A、The medical infertility.
B、The economic insecurity.
C、The housing problem.
D、The governmental policy.
答案
B
解析
原文第三段第三句表明全球婴儿出生率下降最主要的原因是金钱,故B项为答案。A项在第三段提及,但只是部分原因而不是主要原因,因此排除;C项是经济压力的具体表现之一,故排除;D项在文中未提及,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3136575.html
相关试题推荐
A、Histeachers.B、Hisschoolmates.C、Hisfamily.D、Hisfriends.D本题考查细节。由句(7)可知,
PASSAGETHREE[br]Whatwasusedtodisplaythewealthofawoman’sfamily?Decor
A、Countonthefamily.B、Relyonherbalmedicine.C、Ignoretheirillness.D、Reso
PASSAGETHREE[br]Whatdoestheauthorthinkistherightkindoffamilyplanni
(1)Familyplanninghasbeenahugesuccess.Theglobalfertilityratehascr
PASSAGETWOGoodplanningandsecuringpropertyrights.原文最后一段最后一句提到,合理规划和保障财产权益才是
(1)Theurbanpopulationin2014accountedfor54%ofthetotalglobalpopula
(1)Theurbanpopulationin2014accountedfor54%ofthetotalglobalpopula
(1)Theurbanpopulationin2014accountedfor54%ofthetotalglobalpopul
PassageThree[br]Whatdoestheauthorthinkistherightkindoffamilyplanni
随机试题
违反规定同时在两个及两个以上工程项目担任项目经理的,由县级以上地方人民政府建设主
妇女卵巢癌筛查相对可靠的手段为A.腹部B超 B.阴道彩色多普勒超声 C.检测
下列选项中,不属于公积金个人住房贷款特点的是()。A.互助性 B.普遍性
下列哪项是半夏厚朴汤的主治证A.梅核气B.食积证C.结胸证D.心下痞证E.腹胀
国际银行的国际贷款是20世纪70年代国际金融市场上发展最。的业务之一,主要包括(
下列可能产生首过效应的给药途径是A.经皮给药 B.肺部给药 C.口服给药
再生障碍性贫血 A.贫血和出血程度一致B.贫血和出血程度不一致 C.有贫血
(2018年真题)当土石坝出现大面积管涌险情时,宜采用的抢护方法是()。A
有永久性顶盖且顶高4.2m无围护结构的场馆看台,其建筑面积计算正确的是()
肺炎患儿,病室适宜的温度、相对湿度要求A.15~18℃,40% B.18~
最新回复
(
0
)