首页
登录
职称英语
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate
游客
2023-10-23
44
管理
问题
A New Approach to Debate
I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’【T1】 ________ 【T1】 ________
II. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau to teachers
a) Begin with controlled practice: to【T2】 ________ opinions and arguments 【T2】 ________
b) Caution: no【T3】 ________ topics 【T3】 ________
Ⅲ. "Discover Debate" Approach
- Team members: depending on the【T4】 ________ of students 【T4】 ________
- The first stage: creating a【T5】 ________ aid 【T5】 ________
- The second stage: presenting arguments
- The third stage: answering the【T6】 ________ argument 【T6】 ________
a) Pause for the opponents to develop answers or【T7】 ________ 【T7】 ________
b) Evaluate arguments: to look for【T8】 ________ 【T8】 ________
c) Write easily remembered【T9】 ________ 【T9】 ________
- Ending: ask for audience【T10】 ________ 【T10】 ________ [br] 【T4】
A New Approach to Debate
[1]Teachers of English may hesitate to teach debate because they think it is beyond their students’ language ability, or proficiency. But debate can be a powerful tool. It can help students learn to speak naturally and to listen carefully.
Professor Charles Lebeau teaches English and debate in Japan. He wrote "Discover Debate" with Michael Lubetsky. The book helps English teachers and learners understand how to carry on a simple debate.
The "Discover Debate" approach has three stages: creating a visual aid to communicate an argument, presenting the argument and answering the other team’s argument. Each stage puts increasing demands on language ability. It begins with a pre-debate experience.
When teaching debate to English learners, Mr. Lebeau recommends beginning with "controlled practice." Students work in pairs to practice saying opinions and giving reasons in short conversations. [2]They learn to identify opinions and arguments about everyday topics, such as sports stars, foods, weather and habits.
[3]Teachers may be tempted to give students serious topics, such as "People should stop using nuclear power." However, Mr. Lebeau cautions that English learners may not have the necessary language ability to handle such topics. More serious topics often require special vocabulary and research.
Mr. Lebeau’s classes in Japan are like many in universities; they have 40 to 50 students. [4]He has students form debate teams of three or six, depending on the total number of students. [5]Each team creates a visual aid to show their thinking on the topic. The visual is a house: a roof represents an opinion, pillars are the reasons supporting the opinion and the foundation is the evidence.
In the next stage, students present their argument They have to do some talking, but not too much.
[6]The third stage is answering the opponents’ argument. Here, debaters need a higher level of language ability. [7]Mr. Lebeau recommends pausing for the opposing team to develop their answers, or refutations. Each team might go to a different area and discuss the weak points in the opposing argument. Students must first think about the arguments carefully. In "Discover Debate," Michael Lubetsky and Charles Lebeau include a guide to help students evaluate arguments. The evaluation also takes advantage of the visual aid of a house. [8]Students are asked to look for flaws, or problems. They identify things that are either "not true" or "not important."
[9]Students can write easily remembered abbreviations on their opponents’ houses: "NT" for not true. "NAT" for not always true, or "NNT" for not necessarily true. These simple expressions make it easier for students to refute their opponents’ arguments.
Traditional debate includes several cycles of presentation and refutation. For English learners, one cycle of presentation and refutation is usually enough practice. Mr. Lebeau says sometimes he asks the rest of the class to vote on which side won. [10]Asking for audience feedback gives the lesson a good ending. But, he says, additional discussion depends on the situation and the level of the students.
选项
答案
total number
解析
本题考查辩论队的成员。录音提到,勒博先生会根据学生的总人数进行分组,每组3到6个人。因而本题填入total number。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3123943.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Thereisalotofdebateoverthebestway/tomeasuretheec
Readcarefullythefollowingexcerptonteachers*roleargumentintheUSA,a
Theteachers’union______alawsuitagainstthedistrictcallingforrepairing"d
Didyougetyourpoint______totheaudienceinthedebate?A、acrossB、aroundC、
Acutehearinghelpsmostanimalssensetheapproachofthunderstormslongbefore
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
A.adaptB.approachC.capabilitiesD.cluesE.consistently
随机试题
Theypaid______moneyforthemachinethanIexpected.A、littleB、lessC、muchD、
Wewerelateas【C1】______.Myhusbandhadinsistedondoinghis【C2】______byhi
WhatisthetallestmountainonEarth?Mostschoolchildrenwillsaytheansw
Themanager,aswellashisadvisers,_____toattendtheworldfair.A、areagree
唱片公司业务内容一般包括( )A.音乐出版 B.艺员管理 C.演艺交流
延度反映了沥青在某一条件下的变形能力,低温延度值越大,沥青低温环境下开裂性相对较
被周恩来称为“一个无保留追随党的布尔什维克”的人民教育家是( )。A.徐特立
患者女性,63岁。因支气管扩张合并肺部感染、左心心力衰竭入院治疗,入院时T39℃
根据《证券期货经营机构私募资产管理业务管理力法》,下列确定资产管理计划所属类别的
对于医源性感染污染的途径,哪项是错误的A:交叉感染 B:空气 C:医疗器械
最新回复
(
0
)