首页
登录
职称英语
(1) There are two big problems with America’s news and information landscape
(1) There are two big problems with America’s news and information landscape
游客
2023-10-21
54
管理
问题
(1) There are two big problems with America’s news and information landscape: concentration of media, and new ways for the powerful to game it.
(2) First, we increasingly turn to only a few aggregators like Facebook and Twitter to find out what’s going on the world, which makes their decisions about what to show us impossibly fraught. Those aggregators draw—opaquely (不透明地) while consistently—from largely undifferentiated sources to figure out what to show us. They are, they often remind regulators, only aggregators rather than content originators or editors.
(3) Second, the opacity (不透明性) by which these platforms offer us news and set our information agendas means that we don’t have cues about whether what we see is representative of sentiment at large, or for that matter of anything, including expert consensus (共识). But expert outsiders can still game the system to ensure disproportionate attention to the propaganda they want to inject into public discourse. Those users might employ bots, capable of numbers that swamp actual people, and of persistence that ensures
their voices
are heard above all others while still appearing to be humbly part of the real crowd.
(4) What to do about it? We must realize that the market for vital information is not merely a market.
(5) The ideals of the journalistic profession—no doubt flawed in practice, but nonetheless worthy— helped mitigate (缓和) an earlier generation of concentration of media ownership. News divisions were by strong tradition independent of the commercial side of broadcasting and publishing, while cross-subsidized by other programming. And in the United States, they were largely independent of government, too, with exceptions flagrantly (明目张胆地) sticking out.
(6) Facebook and Twitter for social media, and Google and Microsoft for search, must recognize a special responsibility for the parts of their services that host or inform public discourse. They should be
upfront
about how they promote some stories and de-emphasize others, instead of treating their ranking systems as trade secrets. We should hold them to their desire to be platforms rather than editors by insisting that they allow anyone to write and share algorithms (演算法) for creating user feeds, so that they aren’t saddled with the impossible task of making a single perfect feed for everyone.
(7) There should be a method for non-personally-identifying partial disclosure: my Twitter-mates could be assured, say, that I am, in fact, a person, and from what country I hail, even if I don’t choose to advertise my name. Bots can be allowed—but should be known for the mere silhouettes (侧面影像) that they are.
(8) And Facebook and Twitter should version-up the crude levers of user interaction that have created a parched, flattening, even infantilizing discourse. For example, why not have, in addition to "like, " a "Voltaire, " a button to indicate respect for a point—while disagreeing with it? Or one to indicate a desire to know if a shared item is in fact true, an invitation to librarians and others to offer more context as it becomes available, flagged later for the curious user?
(9) Finally, it’s time for a reckoning with the bankrupt system of click-based advertising. By "bankrupt" I don’t mean that it’s bad for America or the world, though it is. Rather, by its own terms it is replete with fraud. The same bots that populate Twitter armies also inspire clicks that are meaningless—money out of the pockets of advertisers, with no human impact to show for it. There are thoughtful proposals to reseed a media landscape of genuine and diverse voices, and we would do well to experiment widely with them as the clickbait architecture collapses on its own accord.
(10) While there is no baseline (基线) pure or neutral architecture for discourse, there are better and worse ones, and the one we have now is being exploited by those with the means and patience to game it. It’s time to reorient what we have with a focus on loyalty to users—honestly satisfying their curiosity and helping them find and engage with others in ways so that disagreement does not entail doxxing (人肉搜索) and threats, but rather reinforcement of the human aspiration to understand our world and our fellow strugglers within it. (本文选自 The Atlantic) [br] In Para. 6, the word "upfront" is closest in meaning to________.
选项
A、cautious
B、frank
C、diligent
D、oblivious
答案
B
解析
语义题。原文第六段第二句指出,它们应该upfront其推广某些故事并淡化其他故事的方式,而不是将它们的排序系统当作商业机密。该句中的instead of表明前后两部分的意思相反,由此可知,它们不应该将其推广某些故事并淡化其他故事的方式当作商业机密,也就是说它们应该坦诚该方式,选项B“坦白的”与原文语义相符,故B为答案。选项A“谨慎的”与原文语义相反,故排除;选项C“勤勉的”和D“未觉察到的”与文义不符,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3118665.html
相关试题推荐
(1)IsitanywonderthatAmericaisalsoacountryofdangerouslyoverweight
(1)IsitanywonderthatAmericaisalsoacountryofdangerouslyoverweight
(1)IsitanywonderthatAmericaisalsoacountryofdangerouslyoverweight
(1)Myjobistoproviderelevant,factuallyaccurateinformationthatisint
(1)ThedramaticcollapseinAmericanconsumerconfidence,followingtheWorl
(1)ThedramaticcollapseinAmericanconsumerconfidence,followingtheWorl
RichAmericansarewillingtotakeconspicuousconsumptiontonewheightsby
RichAmericansarewillingtotakeconspicuousconsumptiontonewheightsby
Informationistheprimarycommodityinmoreandmoreindustriestoday.
Informationistheprimarycommodityinmoreandmoreindustriestoday.
随机试题
[originaltext]Areyougoingoutforlunchnow?(A)Ineedmoretimetostudyth
MostofChina’sinternetusersgoonlinetochatorseekentertainmentrathe
真核生物蛋白质合成的特点是( )。A.先转录,后翻译 B.边转录,边翻译
认真贯彻落实”安全第一、预防为主、综合治理”的方针,实现“()一般事故、()较大
资产评估专业人员采用资产基础法对甲公司股东全部权益进行评估,评估基准日为2017
下列哪项不是霍乱腹泻的特点?A.先呕吐后腹泻 B.无里急后重 C.多数
普通股每股税后利润变动率与息税前利润变动率的比值称为( )A.联合杠杆 B.
我国航天事业中,首次实现月球表面软着陆的是()。A.嫦娥三号 B.天宫一号
某公司注册资本未500万元,该公司年终召开董事会研究公司财务问题。在该董事会的决
(2013年真题)城市地下冷库一般都多设在()。A.城市中心 B.城市郊区
最新回复
(
0
)