首页
登录
职称英语
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the parag
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the parag
游客
2023-10-21
14
管理
问题
(1) If a prize were to be awarded for the world’s clunkiest prose, the paragraphs of indecipherable text that make up "terms of use" agreements would surely win. These legal thickets are designed to protect companies from litigious online shoppers and users of web services. Some firms require agreement, as when users are asked to click a box before creating an Apple ID. Other sites explain their policies without seeking customers’ explicit consent. Few consumers read these terms, let alone understand them. Because they involve no negotiation between customer and company, firms often insert language conferring broad protections to lower their risk of liability. But in a new twist, legal disclaimers designed to limit lawsuits are now unleashing litigation.
(2) A surge of lawsuits in America claims that companies’ online agreements violate consumers’ rights. Consumers are banding together in class actions against targets including Apple, Avis, Bed Bath& Beyond, Toys R Us and Facebook. The cases have a tinge of the bizarre, citing a law passed before companies even had websites. And the lawsuits accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits, a convoluted argument even by the standards of American jurisprudence. Nevertheless, the litigation could have broad implications for the firms involved and for future class actions.
(3) The suits seek to exploit the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago. This was intended to prevent companies that do business in the state from using contracts, notices or signs to limit consumer rights protected by law.
(4) Trial lawyers only recently began to use the TCCWNA to target online agreements. "All firms that seek to represent consumers are constantly mining different data fields for potential ways consumer rights are being violated, " explains Gary Lynch, of Carlson Lynch Sweet Kilpela & Carpenter, a law firm. James Bogan of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, which has defended companies in class actions, describes the use of the TCCWNA as "very creative". But class-action lawyers such as Mr. Lynch may have struck gold.
(5) The lawsuits vary, but generally include allegations that online terms violate consumers’ rights to seek damages as protected by New Jersey law and fail to explain which provisions cover New Jersey. Unusually in American law, plaintiffs need not show injury or loss in order to sue but merely prove violation of the TCCWNA. Moreover, the lawsuits are aimed not only at firms headquartered in New Jersey but all manner of companies that merely do business in the state. Gavin Rooney of Lowenstein Sandler, another law firm, counts about 40 TCCWNA cases in the recent surge. What is more, the TCCWNA entitles each successful plaintiff to at least $100 in damages, plus fees to lawyers and so on. If a website has millions of visitors, the costs to a company could be staggering.
(6) Whether the lawsuits will succeed is unclear. Whatever the outcome of individual claims, the barrage of litigation will probably prompt firms to adjust their online terms. "Don’t overreach." Mr. Rooney advises clients. For example, a company might no longer add words to terms-of-use agreements that seek to limit liability from gross negligence or fraud.
(7) That would be good news for consumers. But changes to terms of use do not always serve their interests. A growing number of firms, emboldened by favourable Supreme Court rulings, have adopted clauses that limit class-action suits. Consumers are instead restricted to resolving disputes individually, in arbitration. The TCCWNA cases may inspire more firms to add such caveats. That might limit frivolous suits. But consumers with grave complaints would be unable to sue, either. In the end lawsuits over restrictive contracts may make them more restrictive still. (本文选自 The Economist) [br] The act enacted in New Jersey 35 years ago was to________.
选项
A、help customers band together to take lawsuits
B、avoid argument by the standards of law
C、prevent customers’ rights from being violated
D、accuse companies of illegally limiting lawsuits
答案
C
解析
细节题。文章第三段第二句提到,法案旨在防止公司在该州利用合同、通知或标记来限制受法律保护的消费者权益。由此可知,该法案是为了保护消费者的应有权益而颁布的,故C为答案。A、B和D均不符合题意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3118337.html
相关试题推荐
(1)TheBritishCourtofAppealhascutlibeldamagesawardedtoMcDonald’s,
(1)TheBritishCourtofAppealhascutlibeldamagesawardedtoMcDonald’s,
(1)Ifaprizeweretobeawardedfortheworld’sclunkiestprose,theparag
(1)Ifaprizeweretobeawardedfortheworld’sclunkiestprose,theparag
(1)Ifaprizeweretobeawardedfortheworld’sclunkiestprose,theparag
(1)Ifaprizeweretobeawardedfortheworld’sclunkiestprose,theparag
Whywasthe17-year-oldBangladeshiboyawardedthe2020InternationalChildren’
随机试题
内容:1.管理委员会会议于2009年10月22日星期四下午两点在济南兴泉酒店325室举行。2.总经理刘涛、销售部经理张军和会计王鸿出席了会议。
[originaltext]W:Dad.AreyougoingtomissmewhenIleaveforcollegenextwe
[originaltext]IfyouareinanymajorcityinAmerica,thechancesarehigh
关于风湿性疾病常见症状,叙述错误的是A.痛风的关节痛固定于少数关节,剧烈难忍
张先生夫妻目前均40岁,预计退休年龄均为60岁,儿子12岁,目前读初一。家庭年税
下列哪项不是茯苓的性状特征A.体轻,能浮于水面 B.断面内部白色,少数淡红
伴有左心功能障碍、肾病和糖尿病的高血压患者宜选A.普萘洛尔 B.依那普利 C
当机动车辆的行车速度达到80公里/小时,其停车视距至少应为()米。A.95
某国内药品生产企业生产碳青霉烯类抗菌药物(特殊使用级),该药品是目前抗菌谱最广,
C公司生产中使用的甲标准件,全年共需耗用9000件,该标准件通过自制方式取得。其
最新回复
(
0
)