首页
登录
职称英语
An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by polic
An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by polic
游客
2023-10-14
57
管理
问题
An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by police officers and the public alike as offering tremendous benefits. The more obvious ones are the ability of police to apply first-aid lifesaving techniques quickly and the greater likelihood of arresting people who may have participated in a crime. It aids in identifying those who witnessed an emergency or crime, as well as in collecting evidence. The overall reputation of a police department, too, is enhanced if rapid response is consistent, and this in itself promotes the prevention of crime. Needless to say, rapid response offers the public some degree of satisfaction in its police force.
While these may be the desired consequences of rapid police response, actual research has not shown it to be quite so beneficial. For example, it has been demonstrated that rapid response leads to a greater likelihood of arrest only if responses are in the order of 1-2 minutes after a call is received by the police. When response times increase to 3-4 minutes—still quite a rapid response— the likelihood of an arrest is substantially reduced. Similarly, in identifying witnesses to emergencies or crimes, police are far more likely to be successful if they arrive at the scene no more than four minutes on average, after receiving a call for help. Yet both police officers and the public de-fine ’rapid response’ as responding up to 10-12 minutes after calling the police for help.
Should police assume all the responsibility for ensuring a rapid response? Studies have shown that people tend to delay after an incident occurs before contacting the police. A crime victim may be injured and thus unable to call for help, for example, or no telephone may be available at the scene of the incident. Often, however, there is no such physical barrier to calling the police. Indeed , it is very common for crime victims to call their parents, their minister, or even their insurance company first. When the police are finally called in such cases the effectiveness of even the most rapid of responses is greatly diminished.
The effectiveness of rapid response also needs to be seen in light of the nature of the crime. For example, when someone rings the police after discovering their television set has been stolen from their home, there is little point, in terms of identifying those responsible for the crime, in ensuring a very rapid response. It is common in such burglary or theft cases that the victim discovers the crime hours, days, even weeks after it has occurred. When the victim is directly involved in the crime, however, as in the case of a robbery, rapid response, provided the victim was quickly able to contact the police, is more likely to be advantageous. Based on statistics comparing crimes that are discovered and those in which the victim is directly involved. Spelman and Brown (1981) suggest that three in four calls to police need not be met with rapid response.
It becomes clear that the importance of response time in collecting evidence or catching criminals after a crime must be weighed against a variety of factors. Yet because police department officials assume the public strongly demands rapid response, they believe that every call to the police should be met with it. Studies have shown, however, that while the public wants quick response, more important is the information given by the police to the person asking for help. If a caller is told the police will arrive in five minutes but in fact it takes ten minutes or more, waiting the extra time can be extremely frustrating. But if a caller is told he or she will have to wait 10 minutes and the police indeed arrive within that time, the caller is normally satisfied. Thus, rather than emphasizing rapid response, the focus of energies should be on establishing realistic expectations in the caller and making every attempt to meet them. [br] What is common in the cases of burglary and theft?
选项
答案
the victim discovers the crime long after it has occurred
解析
(第四段明确提到It is common in such burglary or theft cases that the victim discovers the crime hours,days,even weeks after it has occurred.)
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3095966.html
相关试题推荐
______,computerhasplayedanimportantroleinmodernlife.A、Whatisknownto
It’simportantforcollegestudentstoplantheircareer.Whatfactorsshouldbe
[originaltext]1.W:Scientistssayrestisoneofthemostimportantthingsahu
[originaltext]1.W:Scientistssayrestisoneofthemostimportantthingsahu
ScottishwriterAdamSmithisoftenconsideredthemostimportanteconom
ScottishwriterAdamSmithisoftenconsideredthemostimportanteconom
ScottishwriterAdamSmithisoftenconsideredthemostimportanteconom
ScottishwriterAdamSmithisoftenconsideredthemostimportanteconom
ScottishwriterAdamSmithisoftenconsideredthemostimportanteconom
ScottishwriterAdamSmithisoftenconsideredthemostimportanteconom
随机试题
A.cinemaB.bankC.phoneD.shopE.bellF.stampG.trainB该句意思为:“人们在那里存钱。”与b
[originaltext]W:Tellme,Peter,whatmakesHarrodssofamous?M:Well,it’sth
()格式是由联合图像专家组制定的压缩标准生产的压缩图像文件格式。A.bmp B
中国金融期货交易所首个股票指数期货合约为()。A.沪深300股指期货合约
下列关于证券资产管理业务基本要求的说法,错误的有( ) Ⅰ证券公司从事私募资
小学班集体形成的主要标志是()A.成立班委会 B.形成了正确的集体舆论 C
关于要约的撤销和撤回,下列说法错误的是()。A.要约可以撤销和撤回 B.要约
2019年某地级市下辖10个县市区的年末总人口(单位:万人)分别为: 353
关于2006年1月1日起试行的《商业银行风险管理核心指标》的内容,下列说法正确的
钢筋图中的符号"file_dbpath/image/28/16504000_0.
最新回复
(
0
)