首页
登录
职称英语
A group of scientists known for their skepticism about climate change has re
A group of scientists known for their skepticism about climate change has re
游客
2023-10-10
14
管理
问题
A group of scientists known for their skepticism about climate change has reanalysed two centuries’ worth of global temperature records. Their study largely confirms previous ones: it finds strong evidence that Earth is getting hotter.
"The valid issues raised by climate skeptics, when addressed fully and in detail, do not significantly change the answer," says lead author Richard Muller of the University of California, Berkeley. In a testimony(证据)to the US Congress earlier this year, Muller questioned whether global temperature records showed a significant warming during the 20th century. His project, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature(BEST), has now pulled together global temperature data going back to 1800 from 15 sources, including datasets held by the World Meteorological Organization and US and UK government agencies.
BEST concludes that land temperatures have risen by 1°C since the 1950s. This is largely in line with the three existing global temperature records: GISTEMP, maintained by NASA, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s GHCN and HadCRU, kept by the UK Met Office. The 1°C of warming reflects warming above land masses only, so is not yet a truly global estimate.
In a series of papers that have not yet been estimated but are available on the BEST website, the researchers examine how reliable the temperature data is. Contrary to earlier studies that are often quoted by climate skeptics, the BEST researchers find that including data from weather stations in cities—which are warmer than rural areas—makes little difference to the overall trend. "Urban warming doesn’t unduly(过分地)bias estimates of recent global temperature change," they say.
Blogger Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That has repeatedly claimed that temperature data is unreliable because weather stations are poorly placed—for instance, next to air-conditioning vents or other heat sources. However, BEST found no statistically significant difference in the trends seen at well-placed and poorly placed stations. [br] According to Blogger Anthony Watts, why is temperature data unreliable?
选项
A、The data is from air-conditioning vents.
B、Cities have little difference with rural areas.
C、Weather stations are all in cities.
D、The weather stations are improperly placed.
答案
D
解析
由题干中的Blogger Anthony Watts和temperature data unreliable定位到第五段第一句。该句说明了气温数据的不可靠是由于那些气象站的位置都不合适,D)是对该句的同义转述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3088310.html
相关试题推荐
Canyouchangeoneletterofeachofthesewordstomakethreenewwordswitha
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[br][originaltext]Rus
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[br][originaltext]Rus
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[originaltext]Russiaha
Canyouchangeoneletterofeachofthesewordstomakethreenewwordswitha
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[br][originaltext]Rus
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[originaltext]Russiaha
Whatisscientists’aimofdrillingavolcano?[br][originaltext]16.Scientist
Whatisscientists’aimofdrillingavolcano?[br][originaltext]16.Scientist
Whatisscientists’aimofdrillingavolcano?[br][originaltext]16.Scientist
随机试题
Japanisbecomingafast-breederofyouthculture,withitspopulationofre
HistoricallytheUkrainiansareanancient______whichhaspersistedandsurviv
Wheredidthisconversationmostlikelytakeplace?[br][originaltext]W:Could
[originaltext]W:Iboughtadressingtable,andmyroommateleftherstomeyes
“老乡见老乡,两眼泪汪汪”体现了下列选项中哪一种吸引?()A.才能吸引 B.外
基金高管人员要维护其所管理基金的合法利益,所以他们应当要坚持()原则。A
()能够给员工提供发展的机会,强化员工为组织工作的动机。A:内部招募 B:
共用题干 一般资料:求助者。男性,34岁,个体商户。害怕自己得心脏病,在朋友的
(2014年真题)A公司根据市场信息,准备在B地投资建厂,委托工程咨询公司
女性,20岁。因甲状腺肿大半年来诊,偶有心悸,多汗,进食1.5kg/d,大便2~
最新回复
(
0
)