首页
登录
职称英语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
游客
2023-10-10
30
管理
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject. [br] What can we learn from the passage?
选项
A、Student evaluations of teachers are popular because they are very accurate.
B、In student ratings, students should not be asked questions that require professional background.
C、Student ratings can be used under any circumstances.
D、All colleges are inclined to use student ratings to evaluate teachers.
答案
B
解析
此类题一般考查文章的细节,因此在解答该类型题目时,一定要仔细研读各选项,看清楚选项与原文的异同。A)与第三段首句意思相悖;C)、D)中存在any和All两个绝对性词汇,并且原文中并未提及,也是干扰项;B)与第四段第三、四句含义一致,因此是正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3088228.html
相关试题推荐
Look!The______upatthelake______justbreathtaking.A、sceneries;areB、sceneri
BywhatdidTaylorPhinneymakeadramaticcareerchange?[originaltext]Two-time
Changethefirstwordofthethirdpairinthesamewayastheotherpairstogi
Look!The___________upatthelake___________justbreathtaking.A、sceneries;are
Therearesomeverygoodthingsaboutopeneducation.Thiswayofteachinga
Therearesomeverygoodthingsaboutopeneducation.Thiswayofteachinga
Bothsidesintheconflictagreedto______.A、conversetoproblemsB、exchangeth
Weareourselvesprofoundlychangedbyourinteractionwithmodemtechnology
Weareourselvesprofoundlychangedbyourinteractionwithmodemtechnology
Weareourselvesprofoundlychangedbyourinteractionwithmodemtechnology
随机试题
[originaltext]Interviewer:Goodevening,listeners.ThisisBBC.Todaywearev
They(forbid)______fromenteringthenewbuildingbecausetheymadesuchadamag
Everyoneworriesaboutcatchingacoldattheoffice,butifyou’vegotame
关于传播方法的运用,不正确的是()。A.注重准确性 B.体现共享性 C.突
中水给水管道可装设取水水嘴,但不得与生活饮用水给水管道连接。
对于附条件的民事法律行为中的条件,下列说法错误的是( )。A.条件必须是尚未发
某建设工程的承包人将工程进行了转包,导致实际施工人的工程款被拖欠。根据有关司法解
电镜下能看出周期性横纹的纤维是A、弹性纤维 B、神经纤维 C、胶原原纤维
根据增值税法律制度的规定,下列关于增值税纳税义务发生时间的表述中,正确的是()
关于施工进度计划调整的说法,正确的是()。A.当资源供应发生异常时,可调整工作的
最新回复
(
0
)