首页
登录
职称英语
Principles in Japanese Organizations During the 19
Principles in Japanese Organizations During the 19
游客
2023-09-11
24
管理
问题
Principles in Japanese Organizations
During the 1970s and 1980s, American managers invested much time and money studying Japanese approaches to management because of the fine quality of Japanese products and the general productivity of their organizations. While the American and Japanese cultures differ significantly in many ways, it is still possible to examine Jap0nese management and discover several relevant principles.
Extensive studies of Japanese organizations have demonstrated that Japanese managers stress the following:
Bottom-up Initiative
Japanese managers believe that change and initiative within an organization should come from those closest to the problem. So they elicit(引起) change from below. Top-level Japanese managers see their task as creating an atmosphere in which subordinates are motivated to seek better solutions. The difference is that Western style decision-making proceeds mostly from top management and often does not consult middle management or the worker while in Japan, ideas can be created at the lowest levels, travel upward through an organization and have an impact on the eventual decision. This is "bottom up".
Top Management as Motivator
Japanese managers do not view themselves as having all the answers. When a subordinate brings in a proposal, the manager neither accepts nor rejects it. Rather, he tactfully, politely asks questions, makes suggestions, and provides encouragement.
Middle Management as Impetus for and Shaper of Solutions
In the Japanese system, junior (middle) managers are initiators who perceive problems and formulate tentative (尝试的) solutions in coordination with others. They are not functional specialists who carry out their boss’s directives. Because so much emphasis is placed on coordination and integration,’ solutions to problems evolve more slowly, but they are known and understood by all those who have been a part of the solution generation process. Horizontal communication is stressed as essential to the coordination of problem-solving efforts.
Consensus(多数人的意见) as a Way of Making Decisions
The Japanese are less inclined to think in terms of absolutes, that is, the solution (which is right) versus the alternatives (which are wrong). Rather, they recognize a range of alternatives, several of which might work and all of which possess advantages and disadvantages. When a group makes a decision, all members become committed to the chosen solution. From a Japanese perspective, that commitment, and the ensuing dedication toward working to make the solution successful, is probably more important than the objective quality of the decision. The Japanese have an interesting concept of consensus. Those who consent to a decision are not necessarily endorsing(签署) it. Rather, consent means that each person is satisfied that his point of view has been fairly heard, and although he or she may not wholly agree that the decision is the best one, he or she is willing to go along with it and even support it.
Concern for Employees’ Personal Well-being
Japanese managers have a kind of paternalistic (家长试作风的) attitude toward their employees. Traditionally, Japanese organizations have offered their workers housing, extensive recreational facilities, and lifetime employment. The Japanese believe that it is impossible to divorce a worker’s personal and professional lives. Good managers express concern for workers as persons with homes and families as well as for the quality of the products the workers produce. Managers typically work alongside their subordinates, counsel them regarding their personal lives, and encourage much peer interaction.
Advantage or Disadvantage
It is interesting that principles that are considered, Joy many to be advantages of the Japanese system can also be viewed as problems, at least from an American perspective. There is a fine line between encouraging consensus and forcing it. When groups place too much emphasis on being agreeable and conforming to organizational expectations, poor quality decision making is a likely outcome. Moreover, the Japanese notion of taking care of employees can extend into an extreme form of paternalism with which few well-educated Americans would be comfortable. It is appropriate to protect children or others who cannot think for or look after themselves. But professionals hardly fall into these categories. Most Americans would prefer an organizational system that makes it possible for them to function as mature, intelligent human beings, responsible for their own security and well-being.
Some authors have suggested that Japanese style management as adapted to American organizations is little more than a tool for even greater management control. An employee who has a life commitment to a particular organization, for instance, becomes vulnerable. Since he does not perceive practical options, he is more likely to tolerate existing working conditions, even if he finds them unpleasant. The employee is also encouraged to become a generalist rather than a specialist. Thus, a person’s expertise in a particular area is rarely sufficiently developed so that the organization actually grows to depend on him or her as an irreplaceable employee. Instead, substitutes are readily found. Moreover, should an employee who has worked in this kind of organizational environment decide to abandon his commitment to this organization after a few years of working as a generalist, he would be poorly equipped to move into other American organizations since he would be competing with specialists.
Hardly Suited to American Organizations
The body of research on Japanese organizations continues to grow. Recent research suggests that one cannot generalize about Japanese workers—that males and females, young and old, differ in their decision-making style and management preference. One study reported that Japanese workers were more passive than commonly thought, preferring to be persuaded of the value of a decision by their supervisor over making the decision themselves. However, a different study found that Japanese managers place afar greater emphasis on corporate participation and cooperation than their American counterparts. Thus, a consistent and coherent view of Japanese organizations does not yet exist.
Like the other approaches to management, the Japanese approach is very interesting. In reminding us of the value of the individual, the need for consensus decision making, and the potential of motivating management, it has been extremely useful. It is not a panacea(万能药), however. Because of extreme differences between the Japanese and American cultures, some Japanese management practices are simply poorly suited to American organizations. [br] The Japanese approach is not useful at all to the American management.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
B
解析
见最后一部分,虽然由于文化上的巨大差异,日本企业的从事原则很难适应美国的企业,但是日本企业所崇尚的一些价值观念,例如重视个人价值,大多数人共同决策,鼓励员工的管理方法等,对美国的企业也是有益处的。选项与文章相矛盾。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3003561.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Willyoutakethesebookstothelibraryduringyourlunchhou
[originaltext]W:Willyoutakethesebookstothelibraryduringyourlunchhou
[originaltext]W:Willyoutakethesebookstothelibraryduringyourlunchhou
[originaltext]W:Willyoutakethesebookstothelibraryduringyourlunchhou
Thepriceofbeer______(从50美分到4美元不等)perliterduringthesummerseason.range
Withmoreelectricalhouseholdappliancescomingintobeingduringthetwentieth
[originaltext]Duringthepastdecade,therehasbeenamultifoldincreasei
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEu
Duringthepast20years,____________(我们见证了生活方方面面的变化).wehavewitnessedthecha
随机试题
[originaltext]W:Youarebacklate.Howisthecar,howdidyoufindoutabout
ManyBrazilianscannotread.In2000,aquarterofthoseaged15andolderw
[originaltext]M:Pleasehaveaseat,MissGreen.Thanksforcomingin.Didyou
关于纵隔气肿,下列哪种特征最具有诊断价值A.血压下降、意识模糊 B.颈静脉怒张
税务规划的原则包括()。 Ⅰ.合法性原则 Ⅱ.目的性原则 Ⅲ.规划性原
黄精、玉竹等树脂、树胶类药粉碎时可采用()。A.水飞法B.加液研磨法C.蒸馏D
患者男,34岁。出现头皮发痒且掉发现象,怀疑出现头癣,下列哪种方法最常用于癣病标
()是指具有高度相关性的一组银行产品。A.产品线 B.产品类型 C
下列有关人民法院审理反倾销行政案件的说法正确的有:()A.利害关系人可以直接援
(2020年真题)企业因日常业务经营需要向银行借入短期借款,利息按月预提、按季支
最新回复
(
0
)