首页
登录
职称英语
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
游客
2023-09-10
12
管理
问题
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slipping on your doormat. Light up the stove and you could burn down the house. Luckily, if the doormat or stove failed to warn of coming disaster, a successful lawsuit might compensate you for your troubles. Or so the thinking has gone since the early 1980s, when juries began holding more companies liable for their customers’ misfortunes.
Feeling threatened, companies responded by writing ever-longer warning labels, trying to anticipate every possible accident. Today, stepladders carry labels several inches long that warn, among other things, that you might — surprise! — fall off. The label on a child’s batman cape cautions that toy "does not enable user to fly".
While warnings are often appropriate and necessary — the dangers of drug interactions, for instance — and many are required by state or federal regulations, it isn’t clear that they actually protect the manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. About 50 percent of the companies lose when injured customers take them to court.
Now the tide appears to be turning. As personal injury claims continue as before, some courts are beginning to side with defendants, especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldn’t have changed anything. In May, Julie Nimmons, president of Schutt Sportswear in Illinois, successfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. "We’re really sorry he has become paralyzed, but helmets aren’t designed to prevent those kinds of injuries," says Nimmons. The jury agreed that the nature of the game, not the helmet, was the reason for the athlete’s injury. At the same time, the American Law Institute — a group of judges, lawyers, and academics whose recommendations carry substantial weight — issued new guidelines stating that companies need not warn customers of various dangers or bombard (轰炸) them with a lengthy list of possible ones. "Important information can get buries in a sea of trivialities." says a law professor at Comell Law School who helped draft the new guidelines. "The information on products might actually be provided for the benefit of customers and not as protection against legal liability." [br] Manufacturers mentioned in the passage were obliged to make the best of warning labels sb as to ______ .
选项
答案
avoid legal liability
解析
参见第二段第一句:日益增多的赔偿案令生产商备感威胁,他们便把商品标签上的警告写得很长,预计可能发生的任何一种意外,以逃避法律责任。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3000845.html
相关试题推荐
Peopleshould____________(接受自然光的照射),sincethelightoutsideisalwaysbrighter
[originaltext]W:Thereisatableforeightoverthere.IthinkTomshouldhave
[originaltext]W:Thereisatableforeightoverthere.IthinkTomshouldhave
[originaltext]M:Lookatthosecolorfulbirdsoverthere.Ithinkyoucanteach
[originaltext]M:Lookatthosecolorfulbirdsoverthere.Ithinkyoucanteach
[originaltext]M:Lookatthosecolorfulbirdsoverthere.Ithinkyoucanteach
[originaltext]M:Lookatthosecolorfulbirdsoverthere.Ithinkyoucanteach
[originaltext]M:Lookatthosecolorfulbirdsoverthere.Ithinkyoucanteach
[originaltext]W:Holditrightthere.Putyourhandsagainstthewall.M:ButI
[originaltext]W:Holditrightthere.Putyourhandsagainstthewall.M:ButI
随机试题
Ofthemajorremittanceinstruments,a/an______isthemostexpensiveone.A、MTB、
[img]2015m7x/ct_egreqm_egreqtbz1_0023_20153[/img]In1993thenumberofValentin
基坑开挖过程中,防止损伤地下管线的安全措施中不正确的是()。A.进场后应及
下列有关土地所有权的说法,正确的是( )。A.土地所有权的主体为国家或农民集体
两周就诊率被定义为每百人中两周内因病或身体不适寻求各级医疗机构治疗服务的人次数。
股票内部收益率是指()。A:使得未来股息净贴现值恰好等于股票市场价格的贴现率B
(2019年真题)下列不属于理财师执业资格“4E”认证标准的是()。A.考
根据《关于建立国家基本药物制度的实施意见》。关于基本药物使用的说法正确的是A.政
A.救死扶伤,不辱使命 B.尊重患者,平等相待 C.依法执业,质量第一 D
年度计划项目表主要阐述( )的落实情况。A.投资额 B.图纸、设备 C.建
最新回复
(
0
)