首页
登录
职称英语
How good are you at saying "no"? For many, it’s surprisingly difficult. This
How good are you at saying "no"? For many, it’s surprisingly difficult. This
游客
2023-09-06
22
管理
问题
How good are you at saying "no"? For many, it’s surprisingly difficult. This is especially true of editors, who by nature tend to be eager and engaged participants in everything they do. Consider these scenarios:
It’s late in the day. That front-page package you’ve been working on is nearly complete; one last edit and it’s finished. Enter the executive editor, who makes a suggestion requiring a more-than-modest rearrangement of the design and the addition of an information box. You want to scream: " No \ It’s done!" What do you do?
The first rule of saying no to the boss is don’t say no. She probably has something in mind when she makes suggestions, and it’s up to you to find out what. The second rule is don’t raise the stakes by challenging her authority. That issue is already decided. The third rule is to be ready to cite options and consequences. The boss’s suggestions might be appropriate, but there are always consequences. She might not know about the pages backing up that need attention, or about the designer who had to go home sick. Tell her she can have what she wants, but explain the consequences. Understand what she’s trying to accomplish and propose a Plan B that will make it happen without destroying what you’ve done so far.
Here’s another case. Your least-favorite reporter suggests a dumb story idea. This one should be easy, but it’s not. If you say no, even politely, you risk inhibiting further ideas, not just from that reporter, but from others who heard that you turned down the idea. This scenario is common in newsrooms that lack a systematic way to filter story suggestions.
Two steps are necessary. First, you need a system for how stories are proposed and reviewed. Reporters can tolerate rejection of their ideas if they believe they were given a fair hearing. Your gut reaction (本能反应) and dismissive rejection, even of a worthless idea, might not qualify as systematic or fair.
Second, the people you work with need to negotiate a "What if . . . ?" agreement covering "What if my idea is turned down?" How are people expected to react? Is there an appeal process? Can they refine the idea and resubmit it? By anticipating "What if. . . ?" situations before they happen, you can reach understanding that will help ease you out of confrontations. [br] The author’s second warning is that we should avoid running a greater risk by______.
选项
答案
challenging our boss’authority
解析
文章提出我们不应该冒险挑战老板的权威,题干中的running a greater risk与原文中的raise the stakes属于同义转述,所以by后面的内容就是答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2989775.html
相关试题推荐
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.Thissayingoftenattributedtothel
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.Thissayingoftenattributedtothel
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.Thissayingoftenattributedtothel
[originaltext]W:We’veallheardthesaying"Laughteristhebestmedicine."Ho
[originaltext]W:We’veallheardthesaying"Laughteristhebestmedicine."Ho
Psychologistsarefindingthathopeplaysasurprisinglyvitalroleingivin
Psychologistsarefindingthathopeplaysasurprisinglyvitalroleingivin
Psychologistsarefindingthathopeplaysasurprisinglyvitalroleingivin
Psychologistsarefindingthathopeplaysasurprisinglyvitalroleingivin
Psychologistsarefindingthathopeplaysasurprisinglyvitalroleingivin
随机试题
TheAmericanscreenhaslongbeenasmokyplace,atleastsince1942’sNow,
TheNatureandAimsofArchaeologyIntroductionA)Archaeologyis
肺瘢痕癌常见的组织学类型是:()A.鳞状细胞癌 B.燕麦细胞癌 C.巨细
路基施工检测时,常用的弯沉值测试方法有()。A、贝克曼梁法 B、自动弯沉仪
阴道后壁修补术后,下列哪项护理措施是错误的A:头低足高 B:保持大便通畅 C
材料: 真正热爱阅读的人是不需要理由的.从书本中获得的巨大愉悦.足以让人废寝忘
培训的原则有哪些?
心肺脑复苏的处理必须争分夺秒,主要目的是 A.尽快恢复自主呼吸B.尽快恢复心
建设项目经济评价有一整套指标体系,敏感性分析可选定其中一个或几个主要指标进行分析
A.变质性炎症 B.浆液性炎症 C.增生性炎症 D.化脓性炎症 E.出血
最新回复
(
0
)