首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] This was no ordinary class. The students who came together we
[originaltext] This was no ordinary class. The students who came together we
游客
2023-09-04
49
管理
问题
This was no ordinary class. The students who came together were all science or engineering professors at Cornell University. They had interrupted their research to accept an invitation to take part in an unusual experiment: "an interesting week of poetry". This class was part of a study to answer the questions: Why is science difficult for many non-science students? What can teachers learn about teaching if they take a class that is not in their field?
The students in the poetry class listened to lectures and took notes. They had reading tasks and had to write three short papers. All students noticed one thing — the importance of spoken words. In science and engineering classes, the instructors put tables and drawings on the blackboard. But in this poetry class, the instructors just talked. They didn’t write anything on the board.
The scientists and engineers noticed one similarity between science and poetry. In both subjects, students need to find layers of meaning. Some layers are simple, clean, and on the surface; other layers are deeper and more difficult. This search for different levels of meaning doesn’t happen much in undergraduate science classes, but it is important later; in graduate school. And it is always important in humanities.
Both the poetry instructors and their students learned something about teaching from this experience. One poetry instructor, for example, now sees the importance of using information as he teaches. Most of the scientists agreed on several points. First, humanities classes might help science students to see patterns and decide which information is important. Second, the poetry class was fun. One engineer decided, "We need to change the way we teach engineering to make it an enjoyable experience for students."
But perhaps the most important result of the experience was this: All of the professors began to think about how they teach and how they can teach better.
Questions 32 to 35 are based on the passage you have just heard.
32. What do we know about this unusual class?
33. What was the experiment designed to find out?
34. What do we learn about finding levels of meaning?
35. What did the science professors learn from the experiment?
选项
A、It’s easy for undergraduate students in science.
B、It’s difficult for graduate students in humanities.
C、It’s important for graduate students in humanities.
D、It’s common for undergraduate students in science.
答案
C
解析
问题中的finding levels of meaning是听音的关键。短文中提到This search for different levels of meaning doesn’t happen much in undergraduate science classes,but it is important later,in graduate school…in humanities,故答案为[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2985453.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Soyoureallybelievethatclothescarryakindofmessagefor
[originaltext]W:Soyoureallybelievethatclothescarryakindofmessagefor
[originaltext]W:Soyoureallybelievethatclothescarryakindofmessagefor
[originaltext]W:Oh,it’ssocold.Wehaven’thadsuchaseverewinterforsol
[originaltext]W:Oh,it’ssocold.Wehaven’thadsuchaseverewinterforsol
[originaltext]W:Oh,it’ssocold.Wehaven’thadsuchaseverewinterforsol
[originaltext]W:Oh,it’ssocold.Wehaven’thadsuchaseverewinterforsol
[originaltext](33)InyearstocomeourcurrenteramayberememberedasThe
[originaltext](33)InyearstocomeourcurrenteramayberememberedasThe
[originaltext]Astudentcreditcard?Isitrightforme?Canithelpmepay
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Ifthetrafficwasn’theldupforsolong,Iwouldhavebeent
Whenheappliedfora______intheofficeofthelocalnewspaperhewastoldto
Itwasonceadifficulttime,butintheendeverything______allright.A、turned
A—proofofdeathI—copyrightlawB—bodilyharmJ—sumofclaimC—keywitnessK—ho
[originaltext]M:Lasttimewetalkedaboutthehistoryofpaper,butdoyoukno
甲状舌管囊肿及瘘管()A.与血管组织发育异常有关 B.与甲状舌管的
女性,42岁。肝硬化病人发生昏迷入院。查血钾2.4mmol/L,血钠135mmo
A.急性间质性肺炎 B.中叶综合征 C.结节病I期 D.重症肌无力 E.
患者,女性,25岁,5天前不慎被生锈的铁钉刺伤足底,自行包扎处理。12小时前患者
孔子在中国历史上留下了光辉的文化轨迹,以下关于孔子的说法正确的是()。A.著作
最新回复
(
0
)