首页
登录
职称英语
Trust Me, I’m a Robot With robots now emerging f
Trust Me, I’m a Robot With robots now emerging f
游客
2023-09-04
16
管理
问题
Trust Me, I’m a Robot
With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safety implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences—an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons—the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily.
"Security and safety are the big concerns," says Henrik Christensen, chairman of the European Robotics Network at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. Should robots that are strong enough or heavy enough to crush people be allowed into homes? Is "system malfunction" a justifiable defence for a robotic fighter plane that contravenes (违反) the Geneva Convention and mistakenly fires on innocent civilians?
"These questions may seem hard to understand but in the next few years they will become increasingly relevant," says Dr. Christensen. According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly surpassing their industrial counterparts. By the end of 2003 there were more than 600,000 robot vacuum cleaners and lawn mowers—a figure predicted to rise to more than 4m by the end of next year. Japanese industrial firms are racing to build humanoid robots to act as domestic helpers for the elderly, and South Korea has set a goal that 100% of households should have domestic robots by 2020. In light of all this, it is crucial that we start to think about safety guidelines now, says Dr. Christensen.
Stop right there
So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? "Not enough," says Blay Whitby. This is hardly surprising given that the field of "safety-critical computing" is barely a decade old, he says. But things are changing, and researchers are increasingly taking an interest in trying to make robots safer. One approach, which sounds simple enough, is try to program them to avoid contact with people altogether. But this is much harder than it sounds. Getting a robot to navigate across a cluttered room is difficult enough without having to take into account what its various limbs or appendages might bump into along the way.
"Regulating the behaviour of robots is going to become more difficult in the future, since they will increasingly have self-learning mechanisms built into them," says Gianmarco Veruggio. "As a result, their behaviour will become impossible to predict fully," he says, "since they will not be behaving in predefined ways but will learn new behaviour as they go."
Then there is the question of unpredictable failures. What happens if a robot’s motors stop working, or it suffers a system failure just as it is performing heart surgery or handing you a cup of hot coffee? You can, of course, build in redundancy by adding backup systems, says Hirochika Inoue. But this guarantees nothing, he says. "One hundred per cent safety is impossible through technology," says Dr. Inoue. This is because ultimately no matter how thorough you are, you cannot anticipate the unpredictable nature of human behaviour, he says. Or to put it another way, no matter how sophisticated your robot is at avoiding people, people might not always manage to avoid it, and could end up tripping over it and falling down the stairs.
Legal problems
In any case, says Dr. Inoue, the laws really just summarize commonsense principles that are already applied to the design of most modern appliances, both domestic and industrial. Every toaster, lawn mower and mobile phone is designed to nunimize the risk of causing injury—yet people still manage to electrocute (电死) themselves, lose fingers or fall out of windows in an effort to get a better signal. At the very least, robots must meet the rigorous safety standards that cover existing products. The question is whether new, robot-specific rules are needed—and, if so, what they should say.
"Making sure robots are safe will be critical," says Colin Angle of iRobot, which has sold over 2m "Roomba" household-vacuuming robots. But he argues that his firm’s robots are, in fact, much safer than some popular toys. "A radio-controlled car controlled by a six-year old is far more dangerous than a Roomba," he says. If you tread on a Roomba, it will not cause you to slip over; instead, a rubber pad on its base grips the floor and prevents it from moving. "Existing regulations will address much of the challenge," says Mr. Angle. "I’m not yet convinced that robots are sufficiently different that they deserve special treatment."
Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. "When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?" asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally "yes". But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says.
"Right now, no insurance company is prepared to insure robots," says Dr. Inoue. But that will have to change, he says. Last month, Japan’s Ministry of Trade and Industry announced a set of safety guidelines for home and office robots. They will be required to have sensors to help them avoid collisions with humans; to be made from soft and light materials to minimize harm if a collision does occur; and to have an emergency shut-off button. This was largely prompted by a big robot exhibition held last summer, which made the authorities realize that there are safety implications when thousands of people are not just looking at robots, but mingling with them, says Dr. Inoue.
However, the idea that general-purpose robots, capable of learning, will become widespread is wrong suggests Mr. Angle It is more likely, he believes, that robots will be relatively dumb machines designed for particular tasks. Rather than a humanoid robot maid, "it’s going to be a heterogeneous (不同种类的) swarm of robots that will take care of the house," he says. [br] Japanese firms are competing in the production of robots specifically _____.
选项
A、used in car factories
B、used in hospitals
C、helping the old people
D、helping the school kids
答案
C
解析
原文该句前半个分句提供了关于Japanese firms的信息,其中这个分句末尾的the elderly表明本题应选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2983725.html
相关试题推荐
TrustMe,I’maRobotWithrobotsnowemergingf
TrustMe,I’maRobotWithrobotsnowemergingf
TrustMe,I’maRobotWithrobotsnowemergingf
TrustMe,I’maRobotWithrobotsnowemergingf
TrustMe,I’maRobotWithrobotsnowemergingf
TrustMe,I’maRobotWithrobotsnowemergingf
TheEmergingOnlineGiantsTheymaynothavethenamere
TheEmergingOnlineGiantsTheymaynothavethenamere
TheEmergingOnlineGiantsTheymaynothavethenamere
TheEmergingOnlineGiantsTheymaynothavethenamere
随机试题
StagesofSecondLanguageAcquisitionStageI:(1)______Period:
除托儿所、幼儿园、老人建筑、医疗建筑、教学建筑以外,位于走道尽端房间设一个门的条
某内部审计师对一个部门进行审计,该内部审计师的一位亲密的朋友是此部门的经理。首席
商业银行了解客户的渠道有( )。 Ⅰ.开户资料 Ⅱ.调查问卷 Ⅲ.家访
(2020年真题)客户身份资料和交易记录涉及正在被反洗钱调查的可疑交易活动的,且
参与全国银行间债券回购的金融机构应在()开立债券托管账户。A.中国证券登记
促进B细胞、NK细胞、LAK细胞分化增殖A.左旋咪唑 B.干扰素 C.转移因
下列各项中,房屋租赁基本流程不包括()。A.寻租人确定房源 B.租赁双方签订
W汽车制造厂建设施工土方工程中,承包商在合同标明有松软石的地方没有遇到松软石,因
下列疾病,哪一项常与子宫脱垂相混淆A、膀胱膨出 B、子宫粘膜下肌瘤或宫颈肌瘤
最新回复
(
0
)