首页
登录
职称英语
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, us
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, us
游客
2023-09-02
37
管理
问题
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modern civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telephones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human interaction, long enough to settle back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.
Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets any day on the issue of nuclear energy. The principal discoveries in this century, all in all, are the glimpses of the depth of our ignorance about nature. Things that used to seem clear and rational, matters of absolute certainty—Newtonian mechanics, for example—have slipped through our fingers, and we are left with a new set of gigantic puzzles, cosmic uncertainties, ambiguities; some of the laws of physics are amended every few years, some are canceled outright, some undergo revised versions of legislative intent as if they were acts of Congress.
Just thirty years ago we call it a biological revolution when the fantastic geometry of the DNA molecule was exposed to public view and the linear language of genetics was decoded. For a while, things seemed simple and clear, the cell was a neat little machine, a mechanical device ready for taking to pieces and reassembling, like a tiny watch. But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex, filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today’s imagining.
It is not just that there is more to do; there is everything to do. What lies ahead, or what can lie ahead if the efforts in basic research are continued, is much more than the conquest of human disease or the improvement of agricultural technology or the cultivation of nutrients in the sea. As we learn more about fundamental processes of living things in general we will learn more about ourselves. [br] Scientists have discovered in the past few years that ______.
选项
A、the exposure of DNA to the public is unnecessary
B、the tiny cell in DNA is a neat little machine
C、man actually knows nothing about DNA
D、man has much to learn about DNA
答案
D
解析
细节推理题。根据第四段最后一句话“But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex,filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today’s imagining.”可知,人们对于DNA的研究还所知甚少,由此确定答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2978130.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEur
[originaltext]Centuriesago,duringtheMiddleAges,mostofthelandinEur
Sciencetothehumanmindis______.(正如水或空气之于身体).whatairorwateristothebod
[originaltext]Forcenturies,parrotshavebeenprizedpetsbecauseoftheir
[originaltext]Fullfacetransplantarenolongersciencefictionfantasy,
[originaltext]Withthedevelopmentofscience,scientistshavediscoveredm
[originaltext]Withthedevelopmentofscience,scientistshavediscoveredm
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Comeinandhaveaseatplease,Ann.Pleasemakeyourselfath
WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaboutacutepain?[br][originaltext]Asrece
Theessentialproblemofmaninacomputerizedageremainsthesameasitha
关于微小病变型肾病说法不正确的是A.对激素治疗敏感 B.常有高血压及肾功能减退
肝火犯肺型咳嗽的代表方()。A.二陈汤合三子养亲汤 B.清金化痰汤 C
关于药品说明书说法不正确的是A.说明书根据不断发展的实验研究及临床研究总结,内容
医院药学是以药学为基础,以病人为中心,对病人用药目的研究,但不包括A:有效 B
急性白血病出血的主要原因是A.血小板减少 B.弥散性血管内凝血 C.血小板功
培养学生干部是班主任建设班集体中的一项重要丁作,班主任应做到()。 A.严格
为了概略地衡量蒸气锅炉的热经济性,其常用的热经济性指标除热效率以外,还包括(
最新回复
(
0
)