首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
游客
2023-08-11
47
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit(诉讼)in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test(They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.)The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The author’s opinion of child adoption seems to be that _____.
选项
A、no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B、white families should adopt black children
C、adoption should be based on IQ test results
D、cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
答案
A
解析
根据文章第7段末句“因此,很难说到底怎样才是最好的。但肯定无疑的是,我们大家都需要有善意”,由此可推断,人们并不能制定某种规则来限制它,故此,A与文章的意思相符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2917554.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Isyourfamilyinterestedinbuyingadog?Adogcanbeahap
[originaltext]IfyouareinterestedinstudyingatanAmericanuniversity,
[originaltext]StudentsinAmericanschoolslearnfromanearlyagetogive
[originaltext]StudentsinAmericanschoolslearnfromanearlyagetogive
[originaltext]InNewYorkCitypublicschools,176differentlanguagesare
[originaltext]InNewYorkCitypublicschools,176differentlanguagesare
[originaltext]InNewYorkCitypublicschools,176differentlanguagesare
[originaltext]InNewYorkCitypublicschools,176differentlanguagesare
[originaltext]TexaswasthebiggeststatebeforeAlaskabecametheforty-nin
[originaltext]TexaswasthebiggeststatebeforeAlaskabecametheforty-nin
随机试题
Wheredoestheconversationprobablytakeplace?[br][originaltext]W:Excusem
Despitethe______,Alzheimer’sresearchersarestill______abouttheprospectsfo
Morethanthree-quartersofthechildrenweinterviewedsaidthey’resometim
【S1】[br]【S7】F此处选择第三人称单数动词,而且根据题意,应表示“伴随”,故此选accompanies。
Whatisthepassagemainlyabout?[br]Togetoverabrokenrelationship,people
ABC
根据现行《建筑设计防火规范》的规定,下列储存物品全部属于乙类火灾危险性的是(
关于医疗机构制剂的说法错误的是A.制剂必须按照规定进行质量检验B.合格的,凭医师
男,30岁。上腹部钝器伤3小时来院,曾呕吐少量鲜血,诉上腹及腰部疼痛。查体上腹压
关于腭裂整复手术的基本原则,以下哪项是错误的A.最大程度延长两侧松弛切口 B.
最新回复
(
0
)